[smeagol]

its much better when they cant talk about noms then when they do get caught out the others usually get to hear what they said which makes it fun. now its just going to be too manuipulated .
if i was in there id rather pick who i dont like not be infulenced by others . bring back the tough big brother i say

[Razor]

Originally Posted by smeagol

its much better when they cant talk about noms then when they do get caught out the others usually get to hear what they said which makes it fun. now its just going to be too manuipulated .
if i was in there id rather pick who i dont like not be infulenced by others . bring back the tough big brother i say

+1

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Raph

Agreed. That would mean much more to me at this point than live feed. I dread the thought of block voting and alliances and everything Honestly though, if they scraped the silly idea of discussing nominations then this series might end up being one of my favorites ever. Of course, live feed on top of that would be lovely too

But there's been block voting and alliances in the past so I don't see what the real difference is.

[rk3388]

i like it better this way.
Come on, not talking about nominations never stopped people from voting the same way.

[Cherie]

I like talking about noms, makes it more interesting, even if someone says I didnt nominate you, the other person cant really be sure can they.? so maximum paranoia..anyways I think C5 are damned if they do and damned if they dont, if they followed eveything C4 did, they would be accused of laziness and no vision, they do something else they are accused of taking the original premise away, it really ceased to be a reality show after BB1.... year on year the HMs became more savvy and we lost the chickens it had to evolve..and even with the evolution it is still probably doomed to end sometime soon.

[Marc]

I think it adds a nice change to something that was boring and on it's last legs