[jet]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Yes, and it should have always been that way, if not the game player the most controversial/entertaining housemate. That's just logical.

Makosi should've won BB6 for example, John James/Sam BB11 and there's numerous others. Whoever offers the most and creates the most discussion should be the person that wins, that is what makes the most sense, anything else seems utterly illogical to me, especially choosing winners that have offered **** all.

So yes, absolutely. I guess so far in this series it'd be anyone of Chris, Lydia or Arron.

Yep. I think Nikki should have won just for being herself, and Victor for being an entertaining gameplayer. I don't think the majority would agree on someone like John James, though - who wants an obnoxious twat to win?
I think the winner always has to be entertaining AND likeable, in the end.
I think Aaron got the female vote because he played the lost little boy/eccentic/hard done by/misunderstood role to the hilt. It was an unique approach and he had the ladies in the palm of his hand, with the help of 'bad editing' paranoia.
I mainly prefer a 'real' winner. Someone funny, entertaining, warm AND likeable but with an added 'ommph!!! (not a Josie or a Sophie!!!) I ask a lot, I know!