[alex_front2]

As much as I dislike Conor and Caroline they have contributed alot as subjects for forum discussions.

I didn't like the extreme bullying but in all nasty housemates have a place up to a degree. If everyone is too nicey nicey then we end up with BB4 (Cameron) which was a knee jerk reaction to how spiteful BB3 appeared. As a result of too twee BB4 C4 put in more nasties for BB5 and BB6 which were hits.

Whatdoyathink?

[cassieparis]

You're right. The nasty h/ms are very much value for money.
However keeping them to the later stages gives them a chance to manipulate the audience and other h/ms further.
It also gives them a good chance of winning.
I don't want C1 or C2 to get the £100k but they're now in with a good chance.

[alex_front2]

oh now I want baddies C1 (Caroline) and C2 (Conor) out next - the nasties should go no further than just beyond halfway with a token nasties minion who thinks they are going to win getting to final, thinking they will win but won't eg Luke S

[LaPhantom09]

I have pondered this for a while now, how people say if you evict the bitchy/annoying personalities you get left with the boring ones and its no good. I'm such a fan of the show that I record it & keep my own highlights and have done since 2004.
Now, what I enjoy most, looking back, is not the bitchy, firey rows but the funny stuff and that generally
is due to the makers and the tasks they come up with. I think the tasks been generally good this year especially the one where they were not allowed to laugh. So simple yet very funny.
So although the rows can be a bit entertaining here and there, for me its no reason to keep the bitchy/irritating HMs in over the quieter ones like Luke A.

[Jords]

They need to all be eliminated before the finale except 1 because its good to have a baddie in the final. But they have to be somewhat entertaining and not just vulgar, I really dont find Conor that at all. Caroline yes, Becky somewhat (I really dont like her but she can still make me laugh now and then da bitch).