[BusyBee]

After the 'success' of my stint as tv critic in our firm's monthly newsletter I have been volunteered to have the 'spotlight' placed on me for next month's edition. This consists of me answering a series of questions. The problem is do I answer honestly or in a way that will keep my job and stop people thinking I have gone completely insane. For instance do I dare answer as follows.

Favourite tv programme/series of all time = BB2

What book have you read most often - BB2 uncut (its held together with sellotape)

Who do you admire most and why - Paul Clarke and Helen Adams for how they conducted themselves whilst in the BB house and how they coped with the media when they left, but still managed to have a long lasting relationship.

What do you do in your spare time - well amongst other things - post on a web site devoted to BB along with lots of other completely sane normal people.

Something we dont know about you - I have a collection of BB tapes/dvd, cuttings, magazines etc secreted in a drawer under the bed.



I could go on and one = there's how do people introduce you, favourite possession etc. All of which would involve BB.

Its no good I shall have to be economic with the truth and save face..... or shall I? Though it would certainly liven up the usual boring legal content of the newsletter.

[kaphc]

I say go for the whole BB answers and have a laugh!

As long as you won't lose your job though!

[Sticks]

This link might be of some use

[Boris]

If the advice is NOT TOO late Busy Bee, ignore the 'link' from Sticks and follow your heart.

I always think that HONESTY is the best policy. Anything else gets 'found out' in the end anyway.