Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-09-2012, 10:44 PM #1
michael21 michael21 is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In my big house
Posts: 13,901


michael21 michael21 is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In my big house
Posts: 13,901


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josy View Post
There is so many things wrong with this scenario, something needs to be done about situations like this imo, like limiting benefit entitlement to a certain number of kids that way they may be a bit more careful of getting pregnant in the first place, then theres the amount of cash it cost to accomodate them in a specially adapted council house, it's just ridiculous.

Opinions?
are they not new rules coming in that limit the number of children that can get benfit i think it the 1st 3 then that it might have to check the internet to see when it come in
michael21 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
mum, scrounger, super


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts