[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Marc

Ever consider that I don't want to actually discuss it with you because your attitude towards anybody who you don't agree with is just patronising?

Sophie is a nice person who isn't a wannabe moron who only thinks of themself or goes around soaking up gossip like a sponge. If you can't actually see that it's possible for somebody to like somebody other than who you think should win then maybe it can't be resolved. I'm having my opinion and I won't be told that its wrong.

Well if that's how you feel then I apologise, I don't set out to patronise but I'm not going to lie I sure as hell stand by my opinions each series

I know she's a nice person, so is Sam. I'd probably want to be friends with them in real life, but it isn't real life and I'm not living with them, I'm watching them on an entertainment TV show...and they've done nothing to inspire anything interesting. I couldn't name you one thing either of them has said nevermind done, I don't see how it's a good thing for the show to have a house full of people that do or say nothing and to get rid of those who contribute?

You can have your opinion all you want, no one's saying you can't...but surely every opinion should be able to be justified and argued effectively or else it's pretty much rendered void? If a point can't be backed up then surely it is technically wrong? That's how a debate works...if someone said 'I think all gay people are murderers' and then couldn't back that up in a debate...well then they'd be wrong. If someone says 'what does this housemate contribute to the show?' and explains why contribution is important and the other person can't give any answer then surely it's the same scenario? I'm not trying to be patronising, I'm just trying to have a genuine debate...I really can't see what her worth is, but like I said if someone tells me otherwise then I would concede

[DanielLuis]

I'd want Dan out, but he is in my top 4 along with the other two and Charlie.

[Shaun]

Dan's a ****. No question.