[Lee.]

I'm happy with this decision tbh.

[Kizzy]

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women and children while you're pulling away at your plonkers....no?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women and children while you're pulling away at your plonkers....no?

Lets see how it pans out
as this is a Pre Election gig



I assume miliboy will follow this.

[Ryan.]

Oh good, the feminists are out in force. When they come for you, there will be noone left to save you.

This is how it begins people. NSA, Prism, this.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Ryan.

Oh good, the feminists are out in force. When they come for you, there will be noone left to save you.

This is how it begins people. NSA, Prism, this.

Are you calling me a feminist? I hope not.

Porn doesn't bother me at all..I quite like it actually, but I hate how easily accessible it is for my kids. I want them to be innocent and enjoy their childhood for as long as possible.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Ryan.

Oh good, the feminists are out in force. When they come for you, there will be noone left to save you.

This is how it begins people. NSA, Prism, this.

I beg your pardon?...
Could you explain why you feel anyone who is against exploitation should be labelled a feminist?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Good! bliddy brilliant about time, does nobody think of the sexual exploitation and trafficking of women and children while you're pulling away at your plonkers....no?

People who are willing to throw away their rights depress me.

[Kizzy]

While they are at it the main search engines can link anyone trying to access child porn straight through to the appropriate authorities too...

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

People who are willing to throw away their rights depress me.

You still have the choice to watch porn though, so they're not taking your right away?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

People who are willing to throw away their rights depress me.

What exactly are you trying to say here dezzy? don't speak in riddles if you have something to say say it.
You want anyone including children to be able to access gratuitous porn,.. is this what you're saying?

[arista]

its for young kids
to keep them Blocked from graphic porn


Makes Sense

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by arista

its for young kids
to keep them Blocked from graphic porn


Makes Sense

Young kids shouldnt be on the internet unsupervised anyway IMO

[arista]

Originally Posted by Lee.

You still have the choice to watch porn though, so they're not taking your right away?

Yes I do not want a family filter
So I have no blocks

[arista]

on directv.to
they do not know you are watching Legal porn
it just gives them the USA link site

[arista]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Young kids shouldnt be on the internet unsupervised anyway IMO

Yes Vicky
some are not

but many are

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

What exactly are you trying to say here dezzy? don't speak in riddles if you have something to say say it.
You want anyone including children to be able to access gratuitous porn,.. is this what you're saying?

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Young kids shouldnt be on the internet unsupervised anyway IMO

But you can't supervise them all the time.. I keep the laptop in the living room and they're not allowed to take it to their room... But they all have iPods, smart phones, tablets etc.. Plus you don't know what they're doing when they're at other people's houses.

[Nedusa]

GOOD......about bloody time, if you want to receive Pornagraphic material then you should be able to but have to go through some sort of vetting/opting in procedure. It should never be available at the click of button to absolutely anybody.

I think one of the reasons young children today are so confused re sexual matters is that they view thousands of pornagraphic images and engage in under age sex with absolutely no understanding of the consequences or the responsibilites that come from sexual relationships.

[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Are you calling me a feminist? I hope not.

Porn doesn't bother me at all..I quite like it actually, but I hate how easily accessible it is for my kids. I want them to be innocent and enjoy their childhood for as long as possible.

But why should the millions of unmarried, single people in this country suffer or be forced to declare their love of porn just for the protection of your family? What is wrong with an Opt-in; Where you say "Actually BT, turn off the porn for me - I have young kids who use the internet in my house"

[Ryan.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

THis 100% Dezzy. People are too quick to chuck away their civil liberties just because Mr David says its a bad thing.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's fairly obvious what I'm saying, even a child could decipher what I'm saying.

I'm saying that it's down to the parents to prevent their children looking at age inappropriate stuff, there's plenty of childproof options already. You shouldn't surrender your rights just because you don't want to get a childlock on your internet connection.

I am not
I am saying Yes to porn



This 2014
Pre election gig

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

Bans fags in open places

[LikeABoatOnWater]

Lucky I have quite a significantly sized wank bank saved to my computer

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

You don't have to actually search for it though.. There's a lot of innocent searches will return some dubious results.