[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by anne666

Interesting if it's true that the police are investigating the whole nasty business.

Knowing Hazel's luck she's the one who will probably end up getting prosecuted!

[anne666]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

Knowing Hazel's luck she's the one who will probably end up getting prosecuted!

MM I very much doubt it but lets wait and see. It's all on film, even the prelude which was conveniently edited out for the main show. Then the video vanished from youtube? BB got something to hide or cover themselves for? I think so.

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by anne666

MM I very much doubt it but lets wait and see. It's all on film, even the prelude which was conveniently edited out for the main show. Then the video vanished from youtube? BB got something to hide or cover themselves for? I think so.

I imagine Endemol's lawyers have influenced that.

Both parties committed assaults. One of Hazel's would probably be classed as indecent assault, which is normally considered serious and (possibly) more serious than a threatened, but not carried out, head butt.

We shall see. I expect neither party will press charges and it will all be quietly dropped.

[anne666]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

I imagine Endemol's lawyers have influenced that.

Both parties committed assaults. One of Hazel's would probably be classed as indecent assault, which is normally considered serious and (possibly) more serious than a threatened, but not carried out, head butt.

We shall see. I expect neither party will press charges and it will all be quietly dropped.

I think you are totally wrong. Hazels actions were NOT indecent assault. Sexual incitement I think you will find. He would be laughed out of court with such a ridiculous claim. He struck her and threatened her with violence, both criminal acts.

[bananarama]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

I imagine Endemol's lawyers have influenced that.

Both parties committed assaults. One of Hazel's would probably be classed as indecent assault, which is normally considered serious and (possibly) more serious than a threatened, but not carried out, head butt.

We shall see. I expect neither party will press charges and it will all be quietly dropped.

Wrong. Hazel did not commit an assault. Daley commited the assault along with verbal thtreats.

Hazel was genuinly play fighting with a man unil then she trusted. Pants pulling is probably one of the most done thing in play fights. True they were on TV and drunk and a slip of the memory about cameras made it an offensive thing to do in front of the public.

But remember it can only be offensive to the public if the TV station chooses to broadcast and not censor it.

If the public have been offended CH5 is to blame.......

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by bananarama

Wrong. Hazel did not commit an assault. Daley commited the assault along with verbal thtreats.

..

You obviously know very little about law. Let me try and explain.

It does not matter about the intent (playfight or whatever). Technical assaults were committed by both parties.

Hazel kicked out at Daley, pressed a pillow over his face and pulled his pants down. 3 assaults.

Daley slapped her bum and held her down with a threat to headbutt her. 2 assaults.

Both parties have put themselves at risk of prosecution. However, in the circumstances, it is likely the police would only recommend a prosecution to the CPS if one of the parties formally complained. But that would risk the other party also complaining.

They could both end up in court on assault charges but it is extremely unlikely.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

I see quite a few people denying Daley did anything wrong or they never mention anything when they go thru their rather selective recollection of the events.

I don't...

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Josy

I don't...

Theres one in this thread.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

You obviously know very little about law. Let me try and explain.

It does not matter about the intent (playfight or whatever). Technical assaults were committed by both parties.

Hazel kicked out at Daley, pressed a pillow over his face and pulled his pants down. 3 assaults.

Daley slapped her bum and held her down with a threat to headbutt her. 2 assaults.

Both parties have put themselves at risk of prosecution. However, in the circumstances, it is likely the police would only recommend a prosecution to the CPS if one of the parties formally complained. But that would risk the other party also complaining.

They could both end up in court on assault charges but it is extremely unlikely.

So you class all assaults the same, and these are calculated by the method in your post?....

He pinned hazel using excessive force in his restraint,
issues threats and intimidating and abusive language,
Makes a physical assaults ( slap on the bottom, hands to the throat)

is this not 4 'assaults'?