[Indy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Must be? I dont think so. The rodeo thing all comes down to if you believe the daily star or not IMO. And even if you believe it, knowing what something is doesnt mean you have done it, or ever thought about doing it, or think its great :S

More to the point, if you believe the DS article about the rodeo thing (which even they said was a story he told about something he's heard about, not something he admitted to taking part in), you also have to believe the DS article saying Sam is a violent prick who was barred from pub for assault.

That is an all or nothing situation.

OTOH, the way the two men talk to or about women is not all or nothing. Dexter being disrespectful does not make it impossible for Sam to be disrespectful. Sam being disrespectful does not absolve Dexter. They are two individuals who have done their own things to be judged by.

What we do know is Sam was seen/heard doing things on web clips that were pruned from the web after the fact, other hm's have expressed distaste for his comments, and even Sam himself admitted he'd said some pretty crude things. Why can't those be discussed without Dexter being part of the equation?