About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

zachary · 23-02-2007, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x
But there are plenty of children in America and the UK that need adopting though

Yeah...but does it really matter where the kids from?

Sophii3x · 23-02-2007, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by zacharybinx

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x
But there are plenty of children in America and the UK that need adopting though

Yeah...but does it really matter where the kids from?

I know what your saying Zac, but I'm just saying that there are loads of kids in America that need adopting. But these celebrities fly out to the poorest countries in the world and just take their pick. Madonna's baby had a father, and still took him away.

GiRTh · 23-02-2007, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x

Quote:

Originally posted by zacharybinx

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x
But there are plenty of children in America and the UK that need adopting though

Yeah...but does it really matter where the kids from?

I know what your saying Zac, but I'm just saying that there are loads of kids in America that need adopting. But these celebrities fly out to the poorest countries in the world and just take their pick. Madonna's baby had a father, and still took him away.

I agree. They seem to be treating children like they're fashion accessories. The latest model being a Somalian.

Psylocke · 23-02-2007, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x
Aww I like celebrity kids.
Brangelina p**s me off though when they adopt one after the other

That was the dumbest statement ive ever heard from you

*Disappointed*

Sophii3x · 23-02-2007, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x
Aww I like celebrity kids.
Brangelina p**s me off though when they adopt one after the other

That was the dumbest statement ive ever heard from you

*Disappointed*

Don't be dissapointed with me

Psylocke · 23-02-2007, 05:59 PM

The difference between the kids that need adopting in the us and uk is the kids in other countrys are dying in ophanages the ones in uk and us are not.

There is a higer need to help the ones that will have a higher chance of dying.

Sophii3x · 23-02-2007, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke
The difference between the kids that need adopting in the us and uk is the kids in other countrys are dying in ophanages the ones in uk and us are not.

There is a higer need to help the ones that will have a higher chance of dying.

So US and UK orphans shouldn't be adopted because they have a lower chance of dying than those from poor countries.

I just don't agree with celebrities traveling to poor countries and picking kids.

Psylocke · 23-02-2007, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke
The difference between the kids that need adopting in the us and uk is the kids in other countrys are dying in ophanages the ones in uk and us are not.

There is a higer need to help the ones that will have a higher chance of dying.

So US and UK orphans shouldn't be adopted because they have a lower chance of dying than those from poor countries.

I just don't agree with celebrities traveling to poor countries and picking kids.

Yes,the child who is in risk of dying should be priority.

If Celebs or anyone dosent travel to poor countrys to help those kids noone will and they will die.

Sophii3x · 23-02-2007, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke
The difference between the kids that need adopting in the us and uk is the kids in other countrys are dying in ophanages the ones in uk and us are not.

There is a higer need to help the ones that will have a higher chance of dying.

So US and UK orphans shouldn't be adopted because they have a lower chance of dying than those from poor countries.

I just don't agree with celebrities traveling to poor countries and picking kids.

Yes,the child who is in risk of dying should be priority.

If Celebs or anyone dosent travel to poor countrys to help those kids noone will and they will die.

But you can't stop a child dying. Haven't you heared that every 3 seconds a child in Affrica dies? It's soo sad, but true.

I just think it's wrong that these people take these babies/children away from their families.

Psylocke · 23-02-2007, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke
The difference between the kids that need adopting in the us and uk is the kids in other countrys are dying in ophanages the ones in uk and us are not.

There is a higer need to help the ones that will have a higher chance of dying.

So US and UK orphans shouldn't be adopted because they have a lower chance of dying than those from poor countries.

I just don't agree with celebrities traveling to poor countries and picking kids.

Yes,the child who is in risk of dying should be priority.

If Celebs or anyone dosent travel to poor countrys to help those kids noone will and they will die.

But you can't stop a child dying. Haven't you heared that every 3 seconds a child in Affrica dies? It's soo sad, but true.

I just think it's wrong that these people take these babies/children away from their families.

Angelinas babies

Maddox- was ophaned in war,he had no Family and was in an ophanagein Cambodia that he would have stayed untill he was old enough to be thrown out onto the streets,He was not going to have a happy ending,probably thrown into child prostitution and even worse

Zahara-From Ethiopia was Oprpaned by AIDS,she had no family,she was serverly undernourished six-month-old girl . Shortly after they returned to the United States Zahara had to spend time in a hospital for dehydration and malnutrition. Jolie stated that "she was six months and not nine pounds. Her skin, you could squeeze it, it stuck together.
That baby was going to die.

Im glad Angelina had the money and sence to save those two lifes.

Yes a baby dies every 3 secs,but that dosent mean people should give up and doom them all.

Sophii3x · 23-02-2007, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke
Angelinas babies

Maddox- was ophaned in war,he had no Family and was in an ophanagein Cambodia that he would have stayed untill he was old enough to be thrown out onto the streets,He was not going to have a happy ending,probably thrown into child prostitution and even worse

Zahara-From Ethiopia was Oprpaned by AIDS,she had no family,she was serverly undernourished six-month-old girl . Shortly after they returned to the United States Zahara had to spend time in a hospital for dehydration and malnutrition. Jolie stated that "she was six months and not nine pounds. Her skin, you could squeeze it, it stuck together.
That baby was going to die.

Im glad Angelina had the money and sence to save those two lifes.

Yes a baby dies every 3 secs,but that dosent mean people should give up and doom them all.

Maddox and Zahara were lucky, I agree with that. But I feel that if everyone goes to other countries to adopt, the kids in the US and here will be getting neglected.

Psylocke · 23-02-2007, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x

Quote:

Originally posted by Psylocke
Angelinas babies

Maddox- was ophaned in war,he had no Family and was in an ophanagein Cambodia that he would have stayed untill he was old enough to be thrown out onto the streets,He was not going to have a happy ending,probably thrown into child prostitution and even worse

Zahara-From Ethiopia was Oprpaned by AIDS,she had no family,she was serverly undernourished six-month-old girl . Shortly after they returned to the United States Zahara had to spend time in a hospital for dehydration and malnutrition. Jolie stated that "she was six months and not nine pounds. Her skin, you could squeeze it, it stuck together.
That baby was going to die.

Im glad Angelina had the money and sence to save those two lifes.

Yes a baby dies every 3 secs,but that dosent mean people should give up and doom them all.

Maddox and Zahara were lucky, I agree with that. But I feel that if everyone goes to other countries to adopt, the kids in the US and here will be getting neglected.

But the thing is they have a better social service backup here and the US,they will be set up and given proper healthcare and eductation to set them up for life,They wont be neglected in every sence of the word..Its sad that they might not have parents,but atleast they will have all the benefits that they can get.And live a healthy life.

Sophii3x · 23-02-2007, 06:46 PM

I know what your saying Psylocke

Psylocke · 23-02-2007, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sophii3x
I know what your saying Psylocke

Sophii3x · 24-02-2007, 11:02 PM

I heared Julia Roberts is pregnant

Emilee · 25-02-2007, 12:37 PM

Yer Julia Roberts is pregnant again. Apparantly it was like a miracle preganacy! Im soo happy for her!

tinkerbell · 25-02-2007, 01:47 PM

Why was it a miracle preganancy?

Sophii3x · 25-02-2007, 01:52 PM

Before she had her twins a few years ago she had problems conceiving. So I think they tried IVF and then she bacame pregnant. This time she conceived naturally, with no IVF.