[Kizzy]

It's ok if you're currently in favour and running with the pack, for those who for whatever reason find themselves on the periphery it can feel very different.
There have been some whopping lies told in this thread, and as there is no way to check unless James takes it upon himself to get involved again and repost last years razzies then I guess that's how it is.
It's very disrespectful to harangue James as he's made his point clear, have the razzies offsite why some are so desperate to throw shade I don't know though.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Snow Angel

It's ok if you're currently in favour and running with the pack, for those who for whatever reason find themselves on the periphery it can feel very different.
There have been some whopping lies told in this thread, and as there is no way to check unless James takes it upon himself to get involved again and repost last years razzies then I guess that's how it is.
It's very disrespectful to harangue James as he's made his point clear, have the razzies offsite why some are so desperate to throw shade I don't know though.

Didn't I see you on the Katie Hopkins thread, advocating her right to freedom of speech? Does that not apply to everyone?

[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by Good King Glennceslas

James is admin, not the site owner. I'm sure James doesn't give a toss. If it's happening offsite then James has very little to do with it. It won't affect him in any way.

James obviously does give a toss and does look at offsite matters if extreme enough. The recent perma ban ring a bell?

Originally Posted by The Baby Jesus

Are you saying that you don't believe people will be allowed to opt out? Or people will just ignore the opt rules, and just say what they want regardless?

Yes that is what I'm saying. Well done.

Originally Posted by The Baby Jesus

Matt I know you're reading this thread - can you comment on the opt out list, and whether you intend for there to be one? Cheers.

Well yeah, the fairest way would and should be to have it on here, but James has already made a decision and it's public. Whatever will give him the quietest life is the path he'll choose.

Nope, whatever is fairest and decent is the path he has chosen. Despite the majority of the forum objecting.

Originally Posted by Livia

Didn't I see you on the Katie Hopkins thread, advocating her right to freedom of speech? Does that not apply to everyone?

I have the right to say my opinion too but because I'm in a minority it's easy to shout me down. And there's a difference between freedom of speech and off the scale insults and abuse.