| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#28 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Gammy's surrogate mother will not allow David and Wendy Farnell to take her baby boy Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/gammys-s...#ixzz3AStlvozn They have changed their story since the OP. The sixty minutes interview with the Australian couple broadcast on Sunday. http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/videoindex.aspx From the interview http://www.theage.com.au/world/david...10-102kpn.html He also said in the interview he was relieved when the surrogate said she would keep the baby boy, that this may work. This is the third version of their story. The first. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-Thailand.html The second http://www.smh.com.au/national/gammy...05-100ngq.html The baby does not have "life threatening heart disease" http://www.straitstimes.com/news/asi...heart-disease- Baby Gammy: WA Health Minister Kim Hames apologises for 'inappropriate' comments about father David Farnell http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-1...mments/5663814 Something stinks here and there are two innocent children in the middle of it all.
__________________
Last edited by anne666; 15-08-2014 at 01:13 PM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|