[Tip]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

of course, but that's not the issue up for debate here. who knows though... she may have just wanted to cause a scene to get more airtime, I wouldn't put it past her, she's attention seeking to the max.

Absolutely - she has made it no secret that she treats this as a game.

Anyway, the issue - in this instance I don't feel she had any moral obligation to do anything in particular with her food - so as she chose to throw it for whatever reason, I can't judge it as wrong.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

she can do what she wants with her food.
people will always be dying of starvation!, you could say, why do people spend their money on votes instead of giving the money to starving children!

they would more upset if they had to give their fee to starving people.

I don't think that's really the point. No one's saying that any of it could be sent to starving kids.

Originally Posted by Ace

Why should she allow rude, nasty and disrespectful people to eat her food. Its better to make a statement.

You just described Frenchy.