[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Reacting to other people's reactions? No honey.

Unlike you I'm not presuming to know what caused the incident in the video.

You are assuming the beater is the innocent party.

what other motivation do you see in the video? What do you think provoked that reaction from him? If he's just a violent psychopath as you and your minions suggest, why isn't also attacking the many other people in the video?

You put very little thought into the things you say.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

what other motivation do you see in the video? What do you think provoked that reaction from him? If he's just a violent psychopath as you and your minions suggest, why isn't also attacking the many other people in the video?

You put very little thought into the things you say.

You put very little effort in comprehending what other people say. Where on earth have I suggested he is a violent psychopath?

Everything is always about extremes with you.

I don't see ANY motivation in the video other than the reference to being called a name. School yard stuff. Doesn't justify the level of violence shown in that video IMO.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

You put very little effort in comprehending what other people say. Where on earth have I suggested he is a violent psychopath?

Everything is always about extremes with you.

I don't see ANY motivation in the video other than the reference to being called a name. School yard stuff. Doesn't justify the level of violence shown in that video IMO.

so from one side of your mouth, you say you don't know what provoked this, then from the other side of your mouth you say his reaction wasn't justified.

you have a forked tongue.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

so from one side of your mouth, you say you don't know what provoked this, then from the other side of your mouth you say his reaction wasn't justified.

you have a forked tongue.

Here it is again..... slowly......

Nothing in the text nor the video explains how the two came into an altercation in the first place therefore none of us know the context nor the circumstances around the trigger for their fight.

However, if the text IS everything (as you keep referring to it as the reason) and that man was simply called a schoolyard name then it does not justify the level of violence in that video in the slightest.

Is that explained simply enough for you?

[Denver]

Originally Posted by lostalex

no one invented anything here, we are just reacting to what we saw, unlike you, who is just reacting to other people's reactions (so meta)/

If your reacting to what you saw why saw the man deserved it for being homophobic when you didnt see that

[Chuck]

This happened in Brazil and judging by the comments of the guy who filmed the video, the gay dude is right and people around him agree with him. He said during the video: "that serves him right for provoking who's quiet" and "yes, he's right".

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Here it is again..... slowly......

Nothing in the text nor the video explains how the two came into an altercation in the first place therefore none of us know the context nor the circumstances around the trigger for their fight.

However, if the text IS everything (as you keep referring to it as the reason) and that man was simply called a schoolyard name then it does not justify the level of violence in that video in the slightest.

Is that explained simply enough for you?

wow, you don't get it even when you think about it slowly. I feel sorry for your teachers, they really should have been paid a bonus salary when trying to teach you.

The fact that you still don't understand the context of this video, is literally DUMBfounding (no pun intended).

The context, the motivations, the situation is CLEAR! you have nothing at all to prove or dispute anything about this video being in authentic or the original uploaded was lying. yet you still keep saying " we don't know" then you keep going on to say, he wasn't justified.

HOW can you say the response wasn't justified with such conviction and then in the breath keep saying that no one knows what he was responding to??

think bro, think about what you are saying, cause you aren't making any sense.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by lostalex

so from one side of your mouth, you say you don't know what provoked this, then from the other side of your mouth you say his reaction wasn't justified.

you have a forked tongue.

Marsh Man he come... Kill Buffallo... Dig up yellow metal from Sacred Black Hills.... Marsh man he make many promises... But keep just one ....He promised to take our land and he took it. Marsh man speak with forked tongue.

Nice one Alex.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

wow, you don't get it even when you think about it slowly. I feel sorry for your teachers, they really should have been paid a bonus salary when trying to teach you.

The fact that you still don't understand the context of this video, is literally DUMBfounding (no pun intended).

The context, the motivations, the situation is CLEAR! you have nothing at all to prove or dispute anything about this video being in authentic or the original uploaded was lying. yet you still keep saying " we don't know" then you keep going on to say, he wasn't justified.

HOW can you say the response wasn't justified with such conviction and then in the breath keep saying that no one knows what he was responding to??

think bro, think about what you are saying, cause you aren't making any sense.

Just hold on. Let me get my sat nav. You're taking us on another detour.

I NEVER said it was inauthentic or that the uploader was lying.

Re-read our conversation and when you're back on the main road I'll meet you at Starbucks.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Chuck

This happened in Brazil and judging by the comments of the guy who filmed the video, the gay dude is right and people around him agree with him. He said during the video: "that serves him right for provoking who's quiet" and "yes, he's right".

yup. but don't bother talking to some around here. they don't want to hear the truth, they'd rather just get their post count higher while they talk BS in their chat threads.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Just hold on. Let me get my sat nav. You're taking us on another detour.

I NEVER said it was inauthentic or that the uploader was lying.

Re-read our conversation and when you're back on the main road I'll meet you at Starbucks.

You and Alex make a great double act.

[Marsh.]

Because calling someone a name is provoking someone to having the right to kick your head in.

But the victim of the insult was gay so it makes it justifiable... obviously.

Just like black guys have the right to beat anyone who says anything mean to them... you know because of the slave trade and stuff? Entirely relevant and justifies everything.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Because calling someone a name is provoking someone to having the right to kick your head in.

But the victim of the insult was gay so it makes it justifiable... obviously.

Just like black guys have the right to beat anyone who says anything mean to them... you know because of the slave trade and stuff? Entirely relevant and justifies everything.

If a large intimidating white man comes up to a black kid and starts calling him a ******, i would totally understand the black kid responding in the same way. absolutely.

Same if it was a woman, or a disabled person, or any other minority who knows the history of violence against people of their minority.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

yup. but don't bother talking to some around here. they don't want to hear the truth, they'd rather just get their post count higher while they talk BS in their chat threads.

When in doubt.... resort to petty insults.

Good job I'm not like him from the video otherwise I'd be kicking someone around the room for that.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

If a large intimidating white man comes up to a black kid and starts calling him a ******, i would totally understand the black kid responding in the same way. absolutely.

Same if it was a woman, or a disabled person, or any other minority who knows the history of violence against people of their minority.

Which has no bearing on the video in question.

You going to tell me the guy writhing on the floor being kicked in the head is larger and more intimidating than the guy kicking him?

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Which has no bearing on the video in question.

You going to tell me the guy writhing on the floor being kicked in the head is larger and more intimidating than the guy kicking him?

yes i am saying that, in the video the guy on the ground is clearly larger and more muscular than the gay guy. CLEARLY.

I suspect the guy on the ground was also drunk, based on his flushed red face, which might have given the gay guy an advantage in the fight, bu also makes the bigot homophobe more dangerous to begin with.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

yes i am saying that, in the video the guy on the ground is clearly larger and more muscular than the gay guy. CLEARLY.

Yet more valid justifications. He's practically Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yet more valid justifications. He's practically Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson.

he's certainly not a small boy, he's clearly a fit, large, late 20's/early 30's white man.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by lostalex

he's certainly not a small boy, he's clearly a fit, large, late 20's/early 30's white man.

You do realise Brazillians are not white men

Anyone what has skin colour got to do with it?

[LukeB]

I think he went too far I mean is there any need to result in violence? They're other ways to deal with homophobic abuse but beating the crap out of them makes you the worst person.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by adamski94

You do realise Brazillians are not white men

Anyone what has skin colour got to do with it?

actually the majority of brazillians are of white european heritage. both of the men in this video are clearly white.

(you do know that portugal is in Europe, right?)

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by lostalex

he's certainly not a small boy, he's clearly a fit, large, late 20's/early 30's white man.

And the gay guy is practically a 9 year old.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by LukeB

I think he went too far I mean is there any need to result in violence? They're other ways to deal with homophobic abuse but beating the crap out of them makes you the worst person.

No body even knows for sure what went on beforehand but even if getting physical with this guy was justifiable, kicking him in the head multiple times as he lay on the floor is extremely excessive.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

And the gay guy is practically a 9 year old.

he's certainly not an intimidating character. would you find him intimidating if you saw him walking down the street? no, you'd see him as an easy target, just like that moron on the ground did.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

No body even knows for sure what went on beforehand but even if getting physical with this guy was justifiable, kicking him in the head multiple times as he lay on the floor is extremely excessive.

if that man had attacked your son or daughter on the street, i don't think you'd feel the same way. i think you'd be saying "Kick him one more time for me!"