[Will.]

Quite looking forward to this!

Just seen an article on Tellymix

Big Brother 2015’s Timebomb series will see a Vote to SAVE format, it’s been revealed.


When the show first moved to Channel 5 back in 2011, the series ditched its iconic system of voting to get rid of housemates, instead encouraging fans to vote for their favourite.

http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...ve-format.html

[Cal.]

I think there's already a thread on this - but that may have been speculation.

Is this confirmed?

[Jake.]

If it's confirmed then fair play to them for reverting it back, both systems have their flaws though

[Will.]

Yes I'll get the article

[Denver]

I hope not VTS allows vile creatures like Conner stay till allmost the end

[Denver]

Also they will loose alot of money through it

[Will.]

I prefer vote to save because I like the idea of rooting for a favourite

[Jamesy]

Not believing it until the show starts. Telly Mix could be basing it off what the website says. Which the same happened last year, it said vote to save then was changed to evict when it came to the series starting.

[Glenn.]

So it hasn't been confirmed then?

[Will.]

Originally Posted by Quasar

So it hasn't been confirmed then?

Well telly mix have confirmed it

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Willbrick1999

I prefer vote to save because I like the idea of rooting for a favourite

VTS is not BB though the tagline is 'Who Goes You Decide'

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Willbrick1999

Well telly mix have confirmed it

Tellymix are not exactly reliable plus whoever writes the articles always makes grammar mistakes

[Will.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

VTS is not BB though the tagline is 'Who Goes You Decide'

I know but that's my opinion, I prefer saving

[MB.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

Tellymix are not exactly reliable plus whoever writes the articles always makes grammar mistakes

Originally Posted by adamski94

Also they will loose alot of money through it

*coughs*

People shouldn't get fixated on singular events when discussing the different voting systems - both have their flaws but if you look back through the show, there'll be so many results 'ruined' by VTE. That happens because of varying opinions, not because of the voting system.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by MB.

*coughs*

People shouldn't get fixated on singular events when discussing the different voting systems - both have their flaws but if you look back through the show, there'll be so many results 'ruined' by VTE. That happens because of varying opinions, not because of the voting system.

VTE takes the person you dont like out of the show the way in was created amd stayed for 10 years

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by adamski94

VTE takes the person you dont like out of the show the way in was created amd stayed for 10 years

It takes out the person who the majority of people don't like, not necessarily you.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Who Is She?

It takes out the person who the majority of people don't like, not necessarily you.

So if they get a bunch of unlikeable housemates like last year who is going to want to spend money on saving them?

[Jason.]

It hasn't been confirmed.

Therefore, I'll wait till 18th May, when I presume the first eviction lines will open for the Friday 22nd May eviction - that will tell us whether we are voting to evict or voting to save.

If true. I'm disappointed, as I prefer VTE for Big Brother, and VTS for Celebrity Big Brother.

But, I don't vote, so the money isn't coming out from my pocket. Just hope we don't have bad evictions.

[zakman440]

I'd like to see a mix of vote to evict/vote to save introduced tbh, like BBAU did in 2006. Here's how it works:

Any viewer may cast as many evict or save votes as they choose. Prior to eviction each housemates' save votes are merged with their evict votes; the housemate with the highest number of evict votes – or lowest number of save votes – remaining after the merge is evicted.

[MB.]

Originally Posted by zakman440

I'd like to see a mix of vote to evict/vote to save introduced tbh, like BBAU did in 2006. Here's how it works:

Any viewer may cast as many evict or save votes as they choose. Prior to eviction each housemates' save votes are merged with their evict votes; the housemate with the highest number of evict votes – or lowest number of save votes – remaining after the merge is evicted.

Judging by the sort of people I imagine vote nowadays, that probably wouldn't end well...

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by adamski94

I hope not VTS allows vile creatures like Conner stay till allmost the end

This.

Although I'm starting to wonder if the public should vote at all when they make horrific decisions on both.

[MB.]

And Deana would have been out before the final had the series been VTE. Your point?

[Black Dagger]

Meh it's vastly overrated. VTS only had a few good results really.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Willbrick1999

Well telly mix have confirmed it

So it hasn't been confirmed then.

[Jason.]

Originally Posted by MB.

And Deana would have been out before the final had the series been VTE. Your point?

Really, more votes to evict than Ashleigh Hughes?