[Calderyon]

Since they will always be tampered and changed with to blatantly try to save the favorites of the producers by a "twist". Lets face it, it doesn´t matter who the housemates nominates as they seem to be always some kind of shenanigans going on with them, how matter fair they first seem. So why have them anymore?

What are your thoughts?

[Adamw92]

They should scrap them, they mess with them so often. Perhaps they could just have all the housemates facing eviction every week but give them a chance to win immunity in a task?

[TheManWhoLaughs]

It's a shame because the best part of nominations was getting to hear everyone's personal opinions of their housemates; now they get no privacy, we just get obvious noms (or cowardly ones, like Nick's)

Putting the house in teams to compete to immunity would be better, if they didn't just deliberately try to rig that too.

[Mokka]

They should go to American or Canadian style,

nominate two
no reasons needed
noms allowed to be discussed

they are headed there anyway

[MB.]

Originally Posted by Mokkajava

They should go to American or Canadian style,

nominate two
no reasons needed
noms allowed to be discussed

they are headed there anyway

.

The show's dead in its current format, they may as well have a bit of fun with it.

[Withano]

No they shouldn't be scrapped but with c5, they may as well be