FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-07-2015, 11:09 AM | #76 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
And that, of course, is if we're in bizarro-land where every graduate has above average earnings or even any sort of graduate career at all. Many will simply have that debt sitting gathering interest forever, or be paying it at a low rate every single month until they retire. The alternative being to create a drone workforce "race to the bottom" society where only a few privileged people bother with higher education at all. I just hope that tuition remains free in Scotland for at least another 15 to 20 years, I would be utterly horrified to see my kids saddled with that sort of debt. My own student debt is depressing enough, still sat at around £12000 and chipping at my payslip every month. I can't imagine being saddled with four times that, or more. |
||
Reply With Quote |
10-07-2015, 11:10 AM | #77 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
And that, of course, is if we're in bizarro-land where every graduate has above average earnings or even any sort of graduate career at all. Many will simply have that debt sitting gathering interest forever, or be paying it at a low rate every single month until they retire. The alternative being to create a drone workforce "race to the bottom" society where only a few privileged people bother with higher education at all. I just hope that tuition remains free in Scotland for at least another 15 to 20 years, I would be utterly horrified to see my kids saddled with that sort of debt. My own student debt is depressing enough, still sat at around £12000 and chipping at my payslip every month. I can't imagine being saddled with four times that, or more. |
||
Reply With Quote |
10-07-2015, 11:44 AM | #78 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
I'm pretty sure what this 'northern powerhouse' is, proles from the north/ socially cleansed from the south working for a hand to mouth existence, paying inflated rent for a box room to landlords in the south.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-07-2015, 05:34 PM | #79 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
have to say it was a poor budget overall.....the student grants unnecessary and unfair, the working tax was absurd, the £9 minimum wage is going to prove unaffordable in small businesses in poor areas...and was it index linked for 2020?
|
||
Reply With Quote |
10-07-2015, 06:33 PM | #80 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
the tories need to cut down child benefit, to three children only, single mums or couples who are not working, and are having up to five to eight children when they are not working and demand that we pay for there lifestyle, I know couples who work full time, and can just about afford one child, we need to wake up and think that child benefit should of been limited years ago,
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-07-2015, 08:54 PM | #81 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
They've already capped child tax credits to 2 children and that should be sufficient. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-07-2015, 03:21 PM | #82 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Noticed a post on facebook saying WTC from 2016 entitlement max will drop to £3,850 but minimum wage will rise to £7.20, WTC can be claimed if you work 16hrs a week.
16 X £7.20= £5,990.40 Therefore won't everyone earn too much to claim any WTC?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-07-2015, 03:27 PM | #83 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
good point....I can see the logic of what theyre trying to achieve but it just wont happen....simply put the employers in poorer areas of the uk cannot afford £9 an hour for the most basic jobs. this means massive job losses across the poorer areas
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-07-2015, 04:22 PM | #84 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Where did you get £9ph from?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-07-2015, 04:29 PM | #85 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
(6000 - 3850) x 0.48 = £1032 less than the maximum. I believe maximum WTC per year for most circumstances is around £5000, the person in the above example would now get £3968 per year. Worth noting that that person would currently be getting maximum allowance, so this hypothetical person - already on a low wage - is now over £1000 a year worse off. You are otherwise right though, seems like it will be technically impossible for anyone to be receiving the "maximum amount", because anyone earning less than £3850 is below the minimum hours requirement. |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-07-2015, 04:35 PM | #86 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|