FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29-06-2007, 03:00 AM | #26 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 03:05 AM | #27 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 03:05 AM | #28 | |||
|
||||
Team Flack
|
You people are all so swat! I didn't even know there was a new Prime Minister till I saw it on Sky News today while waiting for the Spice Girls new But then again I'm Irish,I'll just blame that...
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 03:11 AM | #29 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Stick to your posters then love.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 05:12 AM | #30 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 08:36 AM | #31 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Wow, seems we have quite the bunch of right wingers on the forum!!
Some have said about bringing back the Tories, and I'm just wondering what aspects of the old Conservative party you would all like to see brought back? Sleaze? Sexual scandals? Cash for questions? Destruction of the unions? Or is it more that you want the rich to get richer while the poor once again suffer under a Tory regime?? I guess it would be better if Cameron had actually put forward some policies, then maybe I could see the merits of a Tory government. I looked at their NHYes campaign thinking they may have actually put forward a genuine policy solution for the HNS. But I was wrong. It is simply another anti-Labour rant without putting forward any actual solutions. It's easy being in opposition, all you have to do is moan and complain without providing any answers. What we really need is a good strong british communist/socialist worker party, since basically both Labour and Tory have moved toward the centre in the last decade and there are no real lefty parties with a chance of making a difference. PR would redress the balance, but if you were in power having been elected on our current system, would you change it?? And to be honest, if you want to go green, then vote Green. |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 09:28 AM | #32 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
MAGGIE THATCHER!!!!!
Excuse the capitals but I was a little girl when she came into power and I was a little older when she left and actually she was a good solid leader but by golly she was scary Tony Blair.....I've read something Slarti said and one thing that I would disagree (actually there are a few items on Blair I disagree with) but this first is Blair is I do not agree that Blair is responsible for Northern Ireland, old American President Clinton was the one who was instrumental there. Education....hmmmmm. Speaking as a school governor who listens every time to Brown state "Extra money, extra money", sorry everyone this aint true! This statement is repeated over and over again, money is robbed from Peter to pay Paul and it is an utter disgrace. Now I'm going to pay a compliment though because as I said earlier I was brought up in the 'Maggie era' and by golly that was hard. Teachers went on strike back then which I'm sure any teen who hates school are probably thinking "Fantastic" but it wasn't. It screwed up your coursework which thankfully was less then but still annoying. One day we decided to stage a walkout and one of the sixth formers called the press.......Happy days Education is still suffering but massively better than 20 years ago, if only teachers would be left to teach more? Iraq...... If only Tony did not drift so blindly behind Bush. That is my only anger here. In my clearer moments I acknowledge that there must be more the Goverments of our country and America must now that they are not telling us, however, when snippets are released it makes our undercover info look like it has been discovered by a three year old and underminds everything else. Lots more I could talk about but I would be here all day. I voted TB in but he lost me in the last election. Sad really as I am more Labour than anything else!!! |
||
Reply With Quote |
29-06-2007, 10:42 PM | #33 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Excuse me? The Tories don't have any "real policies"?
http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do...licy.home.page They publicise all of their policies for you to freely view them. Lets take "social justice challenge" policy as an example - they show a step-by-step phase of how to fight poverty in the UK, why it occurs, and what they can do to avoid it. And you say their main ideas are to "keep the rich, rich, and the poor, poor?" Definitely challenges Blairs "trustworthy" relationship with Giddens and the third way - which he even admitted himself was a complete and utter failure (Social exclusion is now rife). It's a very old misconception that the Tories aim to keep the rich rich, and the poor poor. Most of their policies are based around getting people into work, educating the masses to the best of their ability and emphasising the meritocracy of hard work - prove me wrong if you can. Also, I want to go green but have real politicans, real values, real policies, real care, and real responsibility for the country - i.e. Conservatives. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 05:19 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
Quote:
Those 6 "policies" are ridiculous - I saw them there last year, haven't they done anything since? I suppose I'll leave it until the manifestoes are published before I decide - but I sure as Hell do NOT want Cameron as Prime Minister. He just has no backbone whatsoever. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 05:23 PM | #35 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
A lot more policies/arguments were put forward in the PMQs with Brown.
Also, Cameron has a backbone but he's dwindling towards centre to pick up labour defectors. Once he's gained the support of them he'll be moving back way right. There's a stigma attached to way-right that wouldn't fair well in elections for Conservatives, so I can understand why he would do this. He's pretty decisive and impulsive too (in the good way, unlike Blair was) and recently turned down to even meet with his EU commitee because he's decided he's not compromising on the subject, it's a dead cert no-no for him. That shows backbone. Edit: The crime policy is the same as it's always been.... right realist, target hardening and surveillance. Basically, "get tough on crime". |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 06:09 PM | #36 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The first two thirds of your post is a good reminder for ones here that were to young to be affected by the consequences of 4 million unemployed. However your reference to socialist worker party describes the old UNELECTABLE labour party.... Some say the Tories have policies. Yeh maybe maybe not. truth is all parties have policies but you never know if they will get implemented in full let alone work as expected.....That goes for the Tories every bit as much as labour or Liberal..... The Tories will regain power sooner rather than later and that will be down to new younger voters who have no experience of the outright evil nature and selfishness of conservatism. To be honest I don't have much regard for any of the UK parties. They are all a bunch of lying two faced control freak hypocrites. What scares me is some young people on here think a Tory Government would somehow deliver a better Britain than Labour........You folk are deadly wrong..... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 06:41 PM | #37 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Quote:
How very patronising of you to even suggest that "younger voters" don't make an educated decision about whom they vote into power...I've studied British History and I'm first the admit that the Conservatives have had major downfalls in the past - but it would be downright stupid to suggest that this is due to modern policies and beliefs systems. Out with New Left, in with New Right. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 10:07 PM | #38 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Patronising or not wisdom comes with age and that is a reality....... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 10:13 PM | #39 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
Of course you can make an educated decision if you haven't experienced the reality. Have you heard of the term "verstehen" ?
Wisdom does come with age, but age does not come with wisdom. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 10:25 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
In your case I am sure that will be very true indeed...... Here is a bit of my history. For half of my voting life I voted Tory. That was the only way as a younger person I learned the lesson that you cannot make educated decisions that are truly educated when half of what you need to know is missing. That other half is "Living the reality" When you are young you have not had chance to do that. That is not patronising that once again is a reality. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 10:27 PM | #41 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
How long has it been since you voted Tory?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 10:45 PM | #42 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Being in the civil service during the entire Tory period and having seen plenty of documentation not available to the public. Believe me lessons were learned. How long did I vote tory for. Since the age of 21. I am now 66. After giving up on the Tory I decided to try Labour....As indicated in my original post I am not well pleased with any current political entity....So i am not trying to push you into voting labour. All I am trying to show is that because you may believe this lot are bad that the other bunch will not be any better either. From my experience much worse...... As you age and try each one out you will learn the only thing any of them are interested in is control freak power trips. You and I and all are just pawns in their power games..... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 10:50 PM | #43 | |||
|
||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
Back on topic - although I am mostly conservative (but fairly near the centre), I will miss Blair - he was a great Prime Minister and I have a lot of respect for him.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
04-07-2007, 11:45 PM | #44 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-07-2007, 12:15 AM | #45 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
05-07-2007, 12:15 AM | #46 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Especially if his name is Tony Blair... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-07-2007, 12:13 PM | #47 | |||
|
||||
van der Woodsen
|
bananarama... I've lived enough years on this Earth to recognise that Labour have not only not done a good job for me and my family, but they've actually done a bad job. Any alternative can only make things better.
Conservative policies have outlined things that appeal to me that Labour have abandoned in their quest to move centre. For me, that means Conservatives get my vote... they can't do any worse. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-07-2007, 04:05 PM | #48 | |||
|
||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
Quote:
I think the majority of Blair's actions were good - Northern Ireland, Sierra Leone, Kosovo, Iraq, and various reforms to the NHS and economy have generally made the country a better place. And he was a confident and able leader, which is something I'm not sure I can say for Brown. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
05-07-2007, 04:09 PM | #49 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Well the prime reason to why i wont miss him, is maybeeeeee becuase he was in charge of thousands of DEATHS.
oh no, tho, i still think hes a good PM.... thats my opinion. |
||
Reply With Quote |
05-07-2007, 04:12 PM | #50 | |||
|
||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
The Iraqi's are killing themselves, we aren't.
Sure, we should have planned the war better, but to be honest we removed a corrupt and murderous tyrant from power and gave them democracy. It was totally unforeseen that this (almost civil war) arose, and Blair did NOT kill the civilians. Did he give instructions to our soldiers to kill them? No. They're responsible for the carnage, and they need to bloody grow up. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|