FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I was thinking during most debates about housemates who only lasted a few days/weeks, most people use the point that they didn't last long enough to be considered 'good'.
So do you think that the time spent in the house actually effects whether a housemate is good or not? I think that it honestly doesn't matter the time they've spent in there, they're good if they're good but I'm sure other's disagree. Thoughts?
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
hot tamale
|
I don't think it's a factor at all. Litteraly Sallie Axl is easily the second best housemate of BB14 and she was there for a week.
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No but you have a better overall judgement of someone who lasts longer
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
-
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|