[zakman440]

Stir up the drama tasks can constitute reading viewer tweets to the housemates, asking them "which housemate said this about another housemate" or "which housemate do you find the most/least ___", amongst other things.

Personally, it's a no. I'd much rather things just play out naturally, plus in most cases they are just pointless and boring.

[Pete.]

Needed no, a necessity for Channel 5 yes

[Samm]

No, natural drama is always better for example Danielle vs Helen

[wendywillow]

needed. Yes! too many in there just coasting trying to flirt to the finish line...I need to be ENTERTAINED!

[LukeB]

Nope.

[Cal.]

They would be needed for a cast like BB4's (going off what people say about that series) I guess. But Channel 5 have never managed to cast a series without at least a few argumentative housemates so no - they've not been needed so far.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

No, natural drama is always better for example Danielle vs Helen

This. Remember that tragic debate task which they did after a week in BB16 to try and stir some drama, and then half an hour later they were all friends again. Drama has to come naturally

[Jason.]

Trash

[Samm]

Originally Posted by hownwbrowncow

This. Remember that tragic debate task which they did after a week in BB16 to try and stir some drama, and then half an hour later they were all friends again. Drama has to come naturally

I kinda liked that task tbh, only because when Sally went mental

[lewis111]

The talant show caused most drama this year so far so no

[TomC]

Originally Posted by ~Sam~

I kinda liked that task tbh, only because when Sally went mental

Ok that bit was good, but it was desperate.

[Greg!]

I'm all for creating dramz through tasks, they need to make it way less obvious though

[Will.]

no.

[joeysteele]

No for me.

Done once and no more fine but in every series however it just gets tedious.