[Rory]

Originally posted by Nowhere

Why doesn't soci do they go on to win? The public seem to reward the naive,andety reward, well-rounded people? I'm sorry, but why do so many support the more, intellectually-challenged housemates,and why uneducated..granted - most have a good heart, but isn't this encouraging more people to be this way..? Many have played the 'dumb' card in the BB house, and Brian is doing so now.. "What's Shakespeare?" I'm sure he must have heard about Shakespeare at some point during his 19 years (or however old he is) I think Anthony was a deserved winner, Pete too, he had a good head on his shoulders, but people like Nikki?! She had,and has a huge fanbase, and I can understand if people find her entertaining, but anything beyond that strikes me as odd.

I wouldn't mind if Liam won,he's 'good people', well mannered, good sense of humour, and he'd do you a good turn, before he'd do you a bad one.

Big Brother isn't a show for 'normal people' anymore. Ever since BB5 it's really changed.

Anthony wasn't a deserving winner, and he only won because the fangirls thought he was amazingly good looking (I'm sure Craig threw in a few votes).

Pete wasn't a deserving winner because people would be discriminating if they hated him, really. "I hate Pete!" - "Because of his tourettes?"
He was an obvious winner from the time Bonnie said "What are you taking?"

Liam won't be a deserving winner because he's exactly like Anthony, only with a little more meat on him. Same haircut, everything. He's a nice guy, still boring, but seriously...Big Brother has turned into a freakshow. So why let someone like Liam win it?

Liam would have won it if he was in BB1, but now that we're in BB8, he's no longer entertaining.