FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place! |
View Poll Results: Should Ofcom be abolished??? | ||||||
Yes | 8 | 53.33% | ||||
|
||||||
No, we need it | 7 | 46.67% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-03-2016, 07:45 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
The sooner Ofcrap is abolished the better. They actually let the loony PC brigade complain about every little damn thing that happens on the TV. The amount of complaints CBB/BB gets every bloody year is just stupid and undeserved.
If Ofcom was abolished, the people wouldn't be able to ruin our TV shows with all of these stupid and unnecessary complaints. #KillOfcomNow |
||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 07:48 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Yes
|
||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 07:49 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Life imitates art
|
I don't care about it really doesn't effect anything for me.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 07:50 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Can I get a witness?
|
Ofcom is the main source of civilian BB promo though
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 07:51 PM | #5 | ||
|
|||
-
|
no because if we didn't actually have a broadcast guideline then can you imagine the shows C5 would ****ing show??
|
||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 08:06 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
-
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 08:12 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Zakaccino
|
Not really.
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by zakman440; 06-03-2016 at 08:12 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 08:24 PM | #8 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No.
Ofcom is necessary. But do they actually play on the people's every tiny complaint? No, so it's not a problem. People like that will just complain directly to the programme makers, makes absolutely no difference to anything. Last edited by Marsh.; 06-03-2016 at 08:25 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 08:25 PM | #9 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 08:31 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
laura carter stan
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 09:13 PM | #11 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Yes for me.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
06-03-2016, 09:17 PM | #12 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No that is a ludicrous idea. They are the only thing that stops channels abusing the crap out of the advertisment regulations.
They do a good job and without them i cant even imagine the invasion of privacy that would result from TV execs being given free reign. Last edited by billy123; 06-03-2016 at 09:24 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
07-03-2016, 01:13 AM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Moment
|
Exactly this.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
07-03-2016, 02:14 AM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Jessica Meuse was robbed.
|
Yes for these two reasons.
1. They never deal with anything that they should be dealing with. 2. People use them to complain about silly **** like "Salad Dodgers" in a Ladbrookes advertisement a few years ago.
__________________
KRO! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|