[lostalex]

i think she should get benefits if she agrees to get sterilized.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by lostalex

i think she should get benefits if she agrees to get sterilized.

I read that her womb is near collapsed and doctors have told her she cant procreate any more, thankfully.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I read that her womb is near collapsed and doctors have told her she cant procreate any more, thankfully.

or maybe it's so stretched out that now she can carry even more babies?

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Councild do not fit flooring or carpets for tenants. Infact, I had a council house and had brand new carpets and stuff down when I decided to move to Greece when I was 18. Council instead of leaving the new carpets and laminate flooring I had done upstairs, ripped the lot out for the next tenant to replace. Reasons...god knows?

its because it would have to be classed as a fixture and fitting which could make the council responsible, if and when it needs replacing.

Why they don't just get the new tenant to sign a disclaimer is crazy though.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

No it didn't magically appear someone fitted it, what I'm saying to you is that it was not the council.

Except I'm saying to you that it was.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Except I'm saying to you that it was.

Are you totally sure about this? Because I'm pretty sure they don't provide carpets / etc. Are you sure it wasn't fitted by the previous occupants and simply left by the council?

The only other explanation I can think of, is that you'll find some sort of hideous safety hazard under that laminate if you ever lift it

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Are you totally sure about this? Because I'm pretty sure they don't provide carpets / etc. Are you sure it wasn't fitted by the previous occupants and simply left by the council?

The only other explanation I can think of, is that you'll find some sort of hideous safety hazard under that laminate if you ever lift it

Maybe some councils will pay for it to be done?

[Gstar]

£500 is not enough tbf

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Except I'm saying to you that it was.

It may be housing association, they might.

[DemolitionRed]

How did we get to talking about cheap laminate flooring?

Ah yes, it was Johnny who suggested she had expensive wooden floors!!

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

How did we get to talking about cheap laminate flooring?

Ah yes, it was Johnny who suggested she had expensive wooden floors!!

Yes all of a sudden council tenants get wooden floors fitted gratis, and chandeliers... and altars to Mr Cameron

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Are you totally sure about this? Because I'm pretty sure they don't provide carpets / etc. Are you sure it wasn't fitted by the previous occupants and simply left by the council?

No, the entire house was gutted after the previous occupants who lived worse than animals.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

No, the entire house was gutted after the previous occupants who lived worse than animals.

one of The Truth's tenants?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

one of The Truth's tenants?

David Cameron. The place was absolutely drenched in pig blood and human semen.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

How did we get to talking about cheap laminate flooring?

Because people that whine about people on benefits would like to see them living on food stamps without any quality of life. It's an attitude I've seen from both sides of the coin.

People on benefits are just an easy target for the armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Because people that whine about people on benefits would like to see them living on food stamps without any quality of life. It's an attitude I've seen from both sides.

People on benefits are just an easy target for the armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.

Spewing and malice, two words that could be attributed to your post

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Spewing and malice, two words that could be attributed to your post

Really? Are you sure you know what Malice means?

malice
ˈmalɪs/Submit
noun
the desire to harm someone; ill will.
"I bear no malice towards anybody"
synonyms: spitefulness, spite, malevolence, maliciousness, animosity, hostility, ill will, ill feeling, hatred, hate, bitterness, venom, vindictiveness, vengefulness, revenge, malignity, malignance, evil intentions, animus, enmity, devilment, devilry, bad blood, backbiting, gall, rancour, spleen, grudge; More

I've shown no malice in that post and I've certainly not spewing anything. It's probably not the best idea to accuse someone of something when you don't know what it means.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Really? Are you sure you know what Malice means?



I've shown no malice in that post and I've certainly not spewing anything. It's probably not the best idea to accuse someone of something when you don't know what it means.

I know exactly what it means you use passive aggressive rhetoric in many of your posts, aimed at members whose views you don't agree with.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I know exactly what it means you use passive aggressive rhetoric in many of your posts, aimed at members whose views you don't agree with.

Oh Sweetheart, in the space of two posts you've called me malicious, passive aggressive and incapable of accepting other people's opinions....all because you cannot accept MY opinion. I'm not attacking you. You are the aggressor here, dear.

You've offered no counter to the post you originally quoted and instead you've attempted to (poorly) drag my character.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Because people that whine about people on benefits would like to see them living on food stamps without any quality of life. It's an attitude I've seen from both sides of the coin.

People on benefits are just an easy target for the armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.

And here, in one post, we have some of the greatest problems on TIBB - Misinterpretation and Sweeping Statements, and Unwarranted Insult.

Without exception, those of us on here who have made unfavourable comments about this particular 'claimant' are criticising HER and HER alone -and NOT all 'people on benefits'.

There is an extensive, ready checkable history in the media, of this woman's lifestyle and life choices - thanks to her penchant for self-promotion and her desire to be in the 'limelight' - and it stamps her as a cynical, selfish, and very astute manipulator, and benefits system abuser.

She is someone who not only deserves the adverse criticism which some of us direct at her, but also someone who DESIRES it, because - as with the Leeds 'model' Josie Cunningham, who abused the benefits system for tens of thousands of pounds in breast enlargement and other cosmetic surgical ehancement procedures on the N.H.S and contacted the media to 'boast' about it all - this arrogant selfish bitch KNOWS that with the resultant and inevitable backlash, comes the 'notoriety' which all but guarantees 'celebrity' and fame.

The fact that both she and Cunningham have 'AGENTS' is irrefutable testament to the above.

The Benefits system and NHS, was never designed to be exploited in such a way, and with each case of much needed funds being 'misappropriated' in such a manner, then the undeniable reality is, that GENUINE people in REAL need are being deprived of the level of help which could alleviate THEIR suffering.

NO ONE on this thread has 'spewed' any 'bile' about 'people on benefits' - only about this particular selfish benefits abuser, and in the greatest IRONY, it is not US who are criticising her who 'would like to see' people on benefits 'living on food stamps without any quality of life' but people like YOU who are more likely to bring about such a scenario, when you are too blinded by your own personal issues that you cannot differentiate between benefit abusers and genuine claimants, and while ever you continue to defend the indefensible as a result.

Far from 'people on benefits' being an easy target for armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.' it appears to me, that it is those of us who have the nerve to speak out about benefit scroungers who are the victims of billious attack by malicious 'armchair warriors' - purely because we speak the truth about scroungers and recognise that they DO indeed exist.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I know exactly what it means you use passive aggressive rhetoric in many of your posts, aimed at members whose views you don't agree with.

I could NOT agree more Cherie.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

And here, in one post, we have some of the greatest problems on TIBB - Misinterpretation and Sweeping Statements, and Unwarranted Insult.

Without exception, those of us on here who have made unfavourable comments about this particular 'claimant' are criticising HER and HER alone -and NOT all 'people on benefits'.

There is an extensive, ready checkable history in the media, of this woman's lifestyle and life choices - thanks to her penchant for self-promotion and her desire to be in the 'limelight' - and it stamps her as a cynical, selfish, and very astute manipulator, and benefits system abuser.

She is someone who not only deserves the adverse criticism which some of us direct at her, but also someone who DESIRES it, because - as with the Leeds 'model' Josie Cunningham, who abused the benefits system for tens of thousands of pounds in breast enlargement and other cosmetic surgical ehancement procedures on the N.H.S and contacted the media to 'boast' about it all - this arrogant selfish bitch KNOWS that with the resultant and inevitable backlash, comes the 'notoriety' which all but guarantees 'celebrity' and fame.

The fact that both she and Cunningham have 'AGENTS' is irrefutable testament to the above.

The Benefits system and NHS, was never designed to be exploited in such a way, and with each case of much needed funds being 'misappropriated' in such a manner, then the undeniable reality is, that GENUINE people in REAL need are being deprived of the level of help which could alleviate THEIR suffering.

NO ONE on this thread has 'spewed' any 'bile' about 'people on benefits' - only about this particular selfish benefits abuser, and in the greatest IRONY, it is not US who are criticising her who 'would like to see' people on benefits 'living on food stamps without any quality of life' but people like YOU who are more likely to bring about such a scenario, when you are too blinded by your own personal issues that you cannot differentiate between benefit abusers and genuine claimants, and while ever you continue to defend the indefensible as a result.

Far from 'people on benefits' being an easy target for armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.' it appears to me, that it is those of us who have the nerve to speak out about benefit scroungers who are the victims of billious attack by malicious 'armchair warriors' - purely because we speak the truth about scroungers and recognise that they DO indeed exist.

Great post Kirk

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

And here, in one post, we have some of the greatest problems on TIBB - Misinterpretation and Sweeping Statements, and Unwarranted Insult.

Without exception, those of us on here who have made unfavourable comments about this particular 'claimant' are criticising HER and HER alone -and NOT all 'people on benefits'.

There is an extensive, ready checkable history in the media, of this woman's lifestyle and life choices - thanks to her penchant for self-promotion and her desire to be in the 'limelight' - and it stamps her as a cynical, selfish, and very astute manipulator, and benefits system abuser.

She is someone who not only deserves the adverse criticism which some of us direct at her, but also someone who DESIRES it, because - as with the Leeds 'model' Josie Cunningham, who abused the benefits system for tens of thousands of pounds in breast enlargement and other cosmetic surgical ehancement procedures on the N.H.S and contacted the media to 'boast' about it all - this arrogant selfish bitch KNOWS that with the resultant and inevitable backlash, comes the 'notoriety' which all but guarantees 'celebrity' and fame.

The fact that both she and Cunningham have 'AGENTS' is irrefutable testament to the above.

The Benefits system and NHS, was never designed to be exploited in such a way, and with each case of much needed funds being 'misappropriated' in such a manner, then the undeniable reality is, that GENUINE people in REAL need are being deprived of the level of help which could alleviate THEIR suffering.

NO ONE on this thread has 'spewed' any 'bile' about 'people on benefits' - only about this particular selfish benefits abuser, and in the greatest IRONY, it is not US who are criticising her who 'would like to see' people on benefits 'living on food stamps without any quality of life' but people like YOU who are more likely to bring about such a scenario, when you are too blinded by your own personal issues that you cannot differentiate between benefit abusers and genuine claimants, and while ever you continue to defend the indefensible as a result.

Far from 'people on benefits' being an easy target for armchair warriors to spew their bile over and engage in their malice without feeling guilty about it.' it appears to me, that it is those of us who have the nerve to speak out about benefit scroungers who are the victims of billious attack by malicious 'armchair warriors' - purely because we speak the truth about scroungers and recognise that they DO indeed exist.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I know exactly what it means you use passive aggressive rhetoric in many of your posts, aimed at members whose views you don't agree with.

[Kizzy]

Why do individuals like this woman, Josie and Dee have agents? Because they fit the image that is pushed to perpetuate the stereotype claimant.
Why else?