[joeysteele]

To be fair to Michael Gove and he is a Conservative politician I have respect for, he did perform really well although in my view he got a slightly easier ride from Faisal than David Cameron got.

However, he still lost me by standing by that £350million figure and the endless don't knows to the questions and no substantiated vision of being out.
He gave a vision but one that has no substance and authority because no one anywhere backs it internationally or even at home in the UK either.

Mragaret Thatcher won a rebate for the UK from the EU,it has stood near solid since she did so in the 1980s.it is wrong to state now by Gove that that rebate could be altered or discontinued, since that also would likely be an issue for a further referendum, so more pie in the sky to me was that claim.
So really no way would the EU attempt that and it also would not I feel, get the agreement of all the other 27 Nations.

He performed well to be fair but it was for me very telling at the end, when asked if he was positioning himself to be PM after Cameron..
He said no to himself but said there were several who could go for PM after Cameron.

Very telling too he did not clearly and strongly insist that Cameron will be there after the EU referendum, or that he would be supporting Cameron to negotiate the leaving terms from the EU either.
I fear the voters are being hoodwinked into having a pre run of a leadership challenge momentum, followed by a leadership election for the Conservative party after this EU referendum.
I hope all undecided voters think very hard on that one.

It saddens me to see a politician like Michael Gove being in any way intentionally or inadvertently party to that too.