[bots]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Offence is taken not given. If you find his tweets offensive then don't read them. People are now seeking out his tweets so they can be offended.

It's just the usual "disgusted from Tunbridge Wells" nonsense.

Peoples character is judged by their behaviour, and part of that is what they write and put their name to. Copying that information so that others can make their own judgement on what is published does not mean they agree with it unless they say so, or they were the original writer

[Marsh.]

It's always poor Hayden's threads.

Stick to Lost hun.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

There is quite a good reason for that. The people I was wiping the floor with got it closed.

Not true. You responded to about five posts that came after mine before the thread got locked.

You wiped the floor with nobody, especially not the facts I presented you with

[smudgie]

He sounds a right charmer.
No doubt if he still has the same attitude he will get voted out anyway.

[T*]

Originally Posted by Jason.

I think his comments are disgusting and I don't agree or condone them whatsoever, but I voted No. And Tila shouldn't have been removed either as that was stupid.

But if and when he says something racist, homophobic, or bigoted inside the house then chuck him out in a heartbeat.

i feel like C5 may cover it up like that **** in a fridge incident

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It's always poor Hayden's threads.

Stick to Lost hun.

The BB17 thread, the last one, this thread

Quite a track record

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Tom*

i feel like C5 may cover it up like that **** in a fridge incident

Unless they want him purposely for his controversy to bring attention to the show, like with Winston.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Not true. You responded to about five posts that came after mine before the thread got locked.

You wiped the floor with nobody, especially not the facts I presented you with

Please stick to the topic of thie thread.

70% no. I think that just about says it all.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Please stick to the topic of thie thread.

70% no. I think that just about says it all.

And here ladies and gentlemen, is the post which says it all

Goodnight.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

And here ladies and gentlemen, is the post which says it all

Goodnight.

You go to bed early. Headache?

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Please stick to the topic of thie thread.

70% no. I think that just about says it all.

It's two different threads so to carry on a debate from the last then use a statistic from this thread is absurd.

[VanessaFeltz.]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Please stick to the topic of thie thread.

70% no. I think that just about says it all.

%70 of us said no to eject someone on day 2 because of this past comments.

Most of us dont believe that someone has a right to speak with pure hate that offends millions of people without the consequences

[LukeB]

I don't think he should have entered in the first place if they already knew like Tila she shouldn't have entered so it's only fair to eject him. I'm going to judge him on what he is like during the house but I would also like to see his tweets expose like they did with Winston. It's only fair.

[AnnieK]

Just because 70% say he shouldn't be evicted doesn't mean they in anyway agree with the tweets. I'm sure if there was a poll on that the result would be very different

[Jamie89]

Omg at those tweets

Originally Posted by Lostie!

If it's something that's worthy of stopping you entering the house in the first place (as plastering derogatory comments about sexuality, race and mental disability absolutely should imo), then it's enough to warrant an ejection.

Totally agree (And I agreed with Tila's ejection, for the record)

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

You go to bed early. Headache?

From reading your posts? Yeah

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Jack_

LMAO my views are outdated?! Are you taking the piss?

And considering this is an 'entertainment show' (which you're right, it is), it's funny that almost every series you can guarantee you'll be campaigning for the entertaining housemates to be evicted and championing some dullard

Andrew is a housemate in Big Brother. A housemate who has made comments regarding race, homosexuality and disability. Therefore we, including myself, are discussing them. It's pretty self explanatory if you think about it.

Firstly what he said was a long time ago and to a friend on social media, not the show, so that's a strange thing to do, seeing as how you are always banging on about judging people on what they do on the show and secondly I don't really spend a lot of time following your views and opinions because they are virtually all verbatim and generally about homosexual issues which is understood, accepted and very well discussed TO DEATH. in closing, we get your point ok, now enjoy the show for what it is, entertainment and arguments. Most of us don't give a toss about what someone said when you were still at school Jack.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I don't see how that's really comparable though. The Helen incidents were open to interpretation, Andrew's comments aren't - they just exist objectively

LT didn't seem bothered when it was just the homophobic tweets being shared, but did when the down syndrome one emerged

Yeah that's true, I think my point made more sense in my head

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by reece(:

It's two different threads so to carry on a debate from the last then use a statistic from this thread is absurd.

Originally Posted by MelihV

%70 of us said no to eject someone on day 2 because of this past comments.

Most of us dont believe that someone has a right to speak with pure hate that offends millions of people without the consequences

Originally Posted by AnnieK

Just because 70% say he shouldn't be evicted doesn't mean they in anyway agree with the tweets. I'm sure if there was a poll on that the result would be very different

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Jack_

From reading your posts? Yeah

I ask tough questions don't I. Sorry.

[Heaven = Winner]

Neither deserve/d to be ejected tbh.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Firstly what he said was a long time ago and to a friend on social media, not the show, so that's a strange thing to do, seeing as how you are always banging on about judging people on what they do on the show and secondly I don't really spend a lot of time following your views and opinions because they are virtually all verbatim and generally about homosexual issues which is understood, accepted and very well discussed TO DEATH. in closing, we get your point ok, now enjoy the show for what it is, entertainment and arguments. Most of us don't give a toss about what someone said when you were still at school Jack.

In case you missed it, I've already said I think people jumping down Andrew's throat for comments he made four years ago is a little over the top. I've also said he, just like Tila, shouldn't be ejected for comments made outside of the house, only those made inside. So why you're preaching this to me is a little confusing - yet again it seems I've encountered someone who doesn't read threads through before they post in them. The comments are being discussed because people on this forum are agreeing with them now, in the present, that's all.

And for your information, I wasn't in school four years ago.

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I ask tough questions don't I. Sorry.

Yep! Tough questions which you receive detailed answers to and then ignore

I pose such tough responses don't I? Sorry

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

I ask tough questions don't I.

Do you really?

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It's always poor Hayden's threads.

Stick to Lost hun.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Jack_

The BB17 thread, the last one, this thread

Quite a track record

I want my justice