[T*]

What if producers use BB money to (or get other people to) vote how many times they want for the housemate they want to stay? Would that be classed as fixing and could it be how they've gotten away with ofcom investigations? Loads of results on C5 have seemed strange; and yes this is just conspiracy but I was lit just thinking about it and if it'd be legal.

[Denver]

Surely the company who deals with the voting wll investigate high number of votes from one number?

[Cherie]

I can see this happening I guess

[Beso]

Basically no fecker votes anymore so the bookies can take control.

[Epic.]

Bianca's best friend spam voted and ruined everything

[Jack_]

I very much doubt they are, but I'm not sure of the legality of something like this

Like, the employees and relatives of employees of a company or programme who are running a competition aren't allowed to enter it, but would this be the same? It would after all be their own money they're spending. Depends if they'd been instructed to by senior producers I guess

[Calderyon]

I don´t think they could get away with it, if that was happening. I think there is an independent phone company supervising and verifying the voting at all times.

More like they rig things with the amount of airtime someone gets in the show.

[Jamie89]

I don't think it would be worth it for them to do it. Too many people would have to know and at some point it would come out. And from the producers pov, why would they want to keep hms who the public aren't voting for? I honestly just think that sometimes we get odd results because not many people vote.

[Calderyon]

Also yes, i think the bet makers do vote a lot in this show.

[sampvt]

problem thrse days is the voting figures are so small the least little tally counts big