[Wiglet]

I hope I am not speaking unfairly here in saying that everyone here so far appears to sympathise with anyone who is treated unjustly because of sexual choice.
That does not appear to be the question? It muddy's the water when a person has broken the rules of an organisation as Dan did in this case, whether unwittingly or not. He should have removed his hat straight away to adhere to the rules and not put it back on.

Say Dans sexual preference was not in question here? Would we be discussing this? The rules would still be the rules and he would had still been asked to leave by the bouncers because he broke those rules.

We only have hearsay about what was said by ALL parties and yes the bouncers could have said what they did and if so that was inexcusable. If that is the case then action must be taken.Dan was still wrong because he inflammed a situation which did not need to be inflammed. Walking out left the management which booked him in a very difficult position were he to do a diva act and he must have known that. Lets not be silly here.

I read the whole blog entry and understood every word of it.
Let's hope the matter can be sorted. I too like Dan and detest people who cannot understand we all come in different shapes, sizes and varieties.

Edited as for some reason I had put the name Richard?