[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by Littlegreen

The last remaining second-chance housemate would win the money. Andrew got that money by evicting Sam during this task, it was the obvious thing to do but in terms of earning the money - it was weak.

The money is "tainted" because it wasn't earned through the public deciding that Andrew deserved to be the last second-chance housemate standing.

Raph is a longtime BB fan and it shows.

Nobody who gets money from BB has "earned" it, they're sat in a house for a few months. Winning the money via a task is no less valid than getting it from the public vote.

Snatching it after preaching about not being there for the money, however, is undeniably hypocritical.

[Pro Sniper]

Spot on Rusti. The boy is so hell-bent on fooling the public and winning the game, he can't even see how pathetic he's being in daring to suggest someone taking 30k(for pressing a ****ing button the fastest) is a "weak move", especially a player who is ineligible to win the show, and had no guarantee of winning the 15k over Sam. Too bitchy and bitter to see it was actually the strongest possible move a player in his position could make. Also agree with Lostie, in that stating one thing so strongly and then acting against it at the first opportunity makes you look like a fake clown. But let's face it, he's in damn good company as far as that's concerned, none more so than when he's in the presence of ridiculous Raph.