Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 22-07-2017, 08:16 PM #18
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,840


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,840


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
The younger taxpayer has always subsidised older people - just like the younger generation of today will be subsidised by future generations - it's how it works and every generation benefits when their time comes.
Except it won't will it. Pension age will be 95 by the time todays tax payers reach the age. So we are asking them to contribute more than they can afford to do, whilst not actually having the chance to reap the benefits themselves. This simply cannot continue forever. It can't. We cannot afford this and I do agree with attempting to sort out the mess that has been made (triple lock promises and such )
Vicky. is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
age, pension, rise, year


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts