FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
26-09-2007, 09:17 PM | #351 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
what do you mean humble pie?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:23 PM | #352 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:25 PM | #353 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
What you are doing is the same as guessing the murderer in a movie, a bunch of you go to see a movie, you all take a "guess", and the one that gets it right goes all "I was right...you were wrong" that is all your posts are, you do not know its her - that is the only absolute truth about any of your posts on this matter, which of course you will not acknowledge I couldn't categorically post that it is not her, even though the truth is I don't think it is her...the simple fact is that I don't know for sure but I suspect that child has been dead for a bit longer than she has been officially reported missing. Because, in my opinion, I suspect that she was dead at least several hours before she was reported missing - and that the parents timeline is in question. I do not know that for a fact, it is what I suspect - and it does not fill me with the urge to gloat about how right I think my theory is The difference between you and I, apparently is that should they find her body in a ditch somewhere I won't be gleefully posting about how right I was. |
||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:27 PM | #354 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Didnt they already prove that its not her?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:29 PM | #355 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
then you can gloat about all us evil people being unable to rejoice in the murder of a child |
||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:30 PM | #356 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Here is the Daily Mail story with high resolution pictures: - The picture that dashes the hopes of Kate and Gerry McCann |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:36 PM | #357 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I replied before all the information was in I am a baaad forum member |
||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:38 PM | #358 | |||
|
||||
Cyber Warrior
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 09:46 PM | #359 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Girl in 'Madeleine in Morocco' photo is peasant farmer's daughter Bushra I have updated all the other links in the thread except the one in Stick's post. The press are always messing with things on there websites. Why can't they leave things alone when they are working alright? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-09-2007, 10:34 PM | #360 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 05:15 AM | #361 | |||
|
||||
Cyber Warrior
|
The people who should be brought to Justice are the McCanns
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 05:25 AM | #362 | |||
|
||||
Cyber Warrior
|
Latest Daily Mail link
Now will the media please leave this Moroccan family alone so they can go back to obscurity and privacy. The Spanish tourist should not beat herself up over this, as this was an easy mistake to make. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 09:11 AM | #363 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Thanks for that link Sticks, it was also interesting to read the comments made by other people.
It seems that now this has been proved to be a false lead that the focus should return to Madeline, finding her is important whether she is alive or not. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 11:20 AM | #364 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
That girl in the second photo with the coloured woman isnt the same girl as that little girl has coloured skin in the first photo we saw that girl that looked exactly like Madeleine had white skin. I still believe that girl in the first photo IS Madeleine and she is out there somewhere being hidden by that family. And everyone who is living near that family is covering up for them.
And the McCanns had nothing to do with Madeleine going missing so stop saying they need to be brought to justice as they didnt do anything!!!!!!!!!!!! . Leave them alone!!!!! there innocent people who have had their own child kidnapped by some sicko out there. I dont know why you cant understand this???. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 12:25 PM | #365 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
It is clear this is just a case of mistaken identity, nothing less and nothing more. If the police thought anything different they would be there now finding out what is going on, but they are not. Quote:
The two girls in the picture are clearly the SAME little girl. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 12:27 PM | #366 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I don't know why you are even bothering Red?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 01:28 PM | #367 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 02:59 PM | #368 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Probably for the same reason as I am Baz! Red is trying to point out the obvious and is simply being ignored.
The explanations are going from the bizzare to the ridiculous in your attempts to be right Amy. A whole village would NOT go as far as covering up for one family especially as Red says there is huge financial incentives for them to tell the truth if it were to be Madeline. That little girl is CLEARLY the one in the original photo that was released. Give it up already Amy, we are not planning on doing a we were right dance..........tempting as it may be!! Its sad really that we are arguing over this when at the root of all of this a little girl is still missing. I |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 04:00 PM | #369 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Thats more than a tad hypocritical in my book, as well as delusional |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 04:08 PM | #370 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Oh my god..... Amy, how on earth can you even say that its Maddie after they have found the girl, and the same woman as the tourist photo'd????
What makes you so sure that its Maddie in original photo? Even her parents have said that they are very sad its not her but that the search must go on. I wish it would have been her, but it wasnt and no amount of "I am right" will ever make that fact real |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 04:16 PM | #371 | |||
|
||||
ylvis♥
|
I gave up with trying to explain to Amy what is meant by an opinion, and what it fact. She really can't grasp that.
That pic was NOT Maddy, but infact a little girl who has been pictured with the same person carrying her. It's not about whos right or wrong, this is about a 4 year old girl who has 'disappeared' and the police have to investigate everything, including the parents. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 04:22 PM | #372 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 04:27 PM | #373 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Your point on the family been covered for is nonsensical, they've had media from around the world with them over the last couple of days and have hidden nothing, do you really think these are the actions of people who are hiding someone? There's no evidence to suggest otherwise and how likely is it that a whole load of people in poverty would sacrifice the chance of a reward just to keep silent on a neighbours hidden child? It's quite clear that you're clutching at straws and making wild and unfounded accusations just to try and cover your back to try and be proven correct.It's obvious that original picture was not of the best quality and now proven that it was not Madeleine, yet your carry on regardless.Carry on with the outlandish refusals, you're only making yourself look silly. Nothing has been proven either way on the McCanns so nobody can factually argue for certain on whether or not they had any involvement with the disappearance of Maddie, until then it's best to keep and open mind.Once again it's a matter of you not being able to separate facts and opinions. |
||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 04:28 PM | #374 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Amy why would a whole town hide a kidnapper?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
27-09-2007, 05:14 PM | #375 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The pictures were of the same girl. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|