[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Marches

But you said in another thread Shane was allowed to silence Ann ‘because free speech’ free speech paradox

Congratulations on completely butchering what I said for your own agenda, if you've become desperate enough to lie about what I've said then that says it all, doesn't it?

I said Shane was allowed to oppose Ann's opinion because of free speech, just like she is to his, the problem is that you, like so many others it seems, does not understand that disagreeing with someone's views is not the same as trying to silence them and pressing on with that mentality is in fact an attempt to silence opposition to Ann's views by debasing their right to reply as nothing more than an attack, not them sharing their own views.

If you are going to try to use my words against me, at least get them right next time.