[Liam-]

There have been some polls that have come out that show he’s making gains and that independents are swinging towards him, the democrats have raised nearly $40million since the debate, half of that coming from new, first time contributors, the panic is completely media driven, the stats show something isn’t matching what the talking heads want people to believe

[Liam-]

The republicans should be worried about the damage Trump’s comment about ‘black jobs’ has caused

[bots]

Originally Posted by Liam-

The republicans should be worried about the damage Trump’s comment about ‘black jobs’ has caused

and hispanic ..... honestly, i don't think they care. Can you imagine what it's going to be like when they start rounding people up. There won't be a legal process supporting it, they will just round people up and lock them up never to be seen again.


There are so many agendas at play, arguments can be spun in any direction for or against removing Biden. From where i'm standing, the vote is either for or against democracy, so it really doesn't matter who the focal point of that is, its the principle that is at stake

[arista]

[Liam-]

Biden is old, Trump is old, but he’s also a convicted felon, he’s been found liable for sexual assault, him and his family are barred from heading up charities in New York because they stole from their childhood cancer charity, he’s publicly, specifically said that he wants to be a dictator.

The kind, bumbly old man, is the obviously better choice than the elderly, life long criminal

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Biden is old, Trump is old, but he’s also a convicted felon, he’s been found liable for sexual assault, him and his family are barred from heading up charities in New York because they stole from their childhood cancer charity, he’s publicly, specifically said that he wants to be a dictator.

The kind, bumbly old man, is the obviously better choice than the elderly, life long criminal

Neither would be trusted to run the local allotment so it is unbelievable that one will rule the world soon


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Neither would be trusted to run the local allotment so it is unbelievable that one will rule the world soon


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

at least one would not be stood in the middle of the potato drills frozen in a brain fog waiting for his carer Jill to come and lead him by the hand away to the safety of their shed

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

at least one would not be stood in the middle of the potato drills frozen in a brain fog waiting for his carer Jill to come and lead him by the hand away to the safety of their shed

But the other would have to be supervised if there were any females around ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Zizu

But the other would have to be supervised if there were any females around ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

And for once we're not talking about Hugh Hefner.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Neither would be trusted to run the local allotment so it is unbelievable that one will rule the world soon


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

This

[Oliver_W]

Either one of them could wake up dead tomorrow. I think a Trump presidency would be funnier (like last time) but otherwise I barely care about either.

[bots]

trump has said often enough he is going to seek retribution. He has also preached hate at every turn. He wants those who committed violence and murdered police on Jan 6th set free. Double standards? Are you having a laugh?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

trump has said often enough he is going to seek retribution. He has also preached hate at every turn. He wants those who committed violence and murdered police on Jan 6th set free. Double standards? Are you having a laugh?

Please do not make apologies for violent leftists like this

Do you not remember David Amess or Jo Cox?

[arista]

[Crimson Dynamo]

well they wont rule the world - they will just be the figurehead for the USA which is a mid size country in the Northern Hemisphere

[arista]

[Presenter of BBC Radio 4's Briefing Room]

They should remove him
from that job.

That Tweet would have been deleted
I would think.

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by arista

[Presenter of BBC Radio 4's Briefing Room]

They should remove him
from that job.

That Tweet would have been deleted
I would think.

Agreed but this is the BBC ! more likely a promotion ..

[bots]

I've been watching how people are reacting to this.

The first point is that the dem machine keeps going back to it was one bad debate and trump is a very bad man. What they are not acknowledging is that it wasn't a bad debate, it thrust a spotlight onto the decline of Biden and his capability to do the job and that has nothing to do with the debate or whether his opposition is a bad man.

They keep saying it was a one off and that he is never normally like that. Well, no-one believes that for a second. They carefully stage manage Biden appearances. If it truly was a one off, he would have been out doing live chat shows with adhoc comments, town hall events, etc etc etc to prove it. No such events are planned. There can only be one reason for that, he isn't up to it.

The dems put out polling numbers of all the main replacements were worse than Biden, but they really weren't, only maybe by a point our 2 and this was the polling before the debate. After the debate, they could easily be ahead of Biden.

The dems are basically telling everyone who disagrees with their position to shut up and get behind Biden. That is a strategy that is doomed to failure. The dems are going to lose the election on the current trajectory, and it seems unlikely they are going to shift from the path unless there is a bloodbath within the democratic party to sort it out.

They keep saying that Reagan and Obama had very bad first debates and still won, but both of them were miles ahead in the polls at the time, Biden was already behind in the polls. That's why it was agreed to do the debate in the first place. It was to change the course of the campaign and put Biden on a winning trajectory. You won't hear any of the dem elites saying that now

The only people that Biden seems to listen to for advice are his wife and Hunter. Are they effectively running the presidency?, because that is what it implies

[Beso]

King of immunity.

[bots]

With the supreme court on Trump's side, it doesn't now even matter who "wins" the election. He will just appeal it up to the supreme court and they will side with him. So whoever ends up being the dem candidate has lost before a vote is counted

[Liam-]

It only goes to the Supreme Court if the election ends in a tie, if (when) Trump loses the election decisively again, there will be no grounds for it to be appealed

[bots]

Originally Posted by Liam-

It only goes to the Supreme Court if the election ends in a tie, if (when) Trump loses the election decisively again, there will be no grounds for it to be appealed

thats not true, it can go to the supreme court if they claim fraud etc. However, Biden can now commit fraud and be immune, so it's all gone to crazy town.

I think americans need to wake up to the reality that trump is more likely to be the next president than not

[James]

The difference to 2020 is that if Trump loses this time he will have nothing to hang on to.

[Oliver_W]

[Maru]

Literally no one I know is excited about this upcoming election or politics in general. It's as if most are just minding their own business and checking out of the rat race.

Trump, if he loses, wouldn't be able to do another campaign in 4 years time I don't imagine, for the simple fact he really would be too old. I don't think he has Biden's personality where he'd rather run the country living off a vent rather than to pass to someone more capable. He'd just quit and undermine his replacement in a raging (but senile) manner.

Nothing really changes for me, except that one party will be in to chip away at the foundation, whether it's the Constitution or economically speaking, while the other is out of play. We never hear of a politician that believes in leaving well enough alone.