[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

My friend "got married" in a commitment ceremony in India....it was not recognised as a legal marriage here so they had to get married again here to legalise it. If you ask her, she got married in India, they celebrate their wedding anniversary on that day....she doesn't say...well we had a commitment ceremony in india but as it was not a legal marriage we also had a registry office do when we got back to make it legal here on our return. It's just semantics really.....of everything that could be construed as a lie, this one pushes it a bit in all honesty

It more than pushes it , it's another ridiculous petty thing to belittle Meghan for.

Exactly
And some couples even have another wedding for their families to see them get married,If for whatever reason they missed the first one .

[jet]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

My friend "got married" in a commitment ceremony in India....it was not recognised as a legal marriage here so they had to get married again here to legalise it. If you ask her, she got married in India, they celebrate their wedding anniversary on that day....she doesn't say...well we had a commitment ceremony in india but as it was not a legal marriage we also had a registry office do when we got back to make it legal here on our return. It's just semantics really.....of everything that could be construed as a lie, this one pushes it a bit in all honesty

I kind of agree, I think it was said to be a bit controversial as she does like the attention of controversy around her. There were other lies she told which were far more serious.

[thesheriff443]

This ain’t your mates from the pub who got married it’s a couple who went on a
Show hosted by their mate that was showed around the world in which they would have their chance to tell there side of the story

On their version has been proved to be full of lies

[Beso]

Theres a good 60 minutes Australian, take on the documentary. Available on YouTube.

[Alf]

Meghan's favourite pop group is Charles and Eddie

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

I've already asked that.
Seriously though, the labels that have been put on those who dislike her over the last year plus have been relentless and very derogatory and are used instead of proper debate giving actual reasons why so many take the time to defend her.

............the reasons that so many take the time to defend Meghan and Harry have little to do with Meghan and Harry but, if you were capable of understanding that, and capable of understanding what the actual reasons are, then there wouldn’t be an issue in the first place. It’s a bit of a catch 22 really.

I mean do you actually understand that? Do you understand that I (and I assume many here) have no personal feelings one way or the other about Meghan Markle? That that’s really, REALLY not the point (and yet in another sense, the entire point).

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

............the reasons that so many take the time to defend Meghan and Harry have little to do with Meghan and Harry but, if you were capable of understanding that, and capable of understanding what the actual reasons are, then there wouldn’t be an issue in the first place. It’s a bit of a catch 22 really.

I mean do you actually understand that? Do you understand that I (and I assume many here) have no personal feelings one way or the other about Meghan Markle? That that’s really, REALLY not the point (and yet in another sense, the entire point).

Do you actually understand or believe what you are saying?
These threads are actually about Harry’s and Meghans actions and choices!

The threads are not about racism mental health privacy wealth or any other subject in it’s entirety.

The fact that working class people choose to defend a billionaire and that they should have the money instead of charity is the biggest concern in my eyes.

People have been using the race card in order to try and shut people down but it’s simple not about race.

Lately I’m sharing more of my private life on here and for me it will never be and never has been about race

I’ve had a short but good physical relationship with a black South African woman who grew up in a hut I’ve got no hate in my heart towards people of colour.

[Ammi]

...there is very little ‘debate’....I mean, the whole thing about Meghan and Harry is either we like them or we dislike them with very little in between...for me, a ‘natural default’ if you like, is to like someone unless their actions/behaviour would change those feelings about them...Meghan and Harry have quite openly declared their feelings about the U.K. media and their willingness to slant any story any which way so it’s pretty obvious that, that same media are feeling slighted and going to be even less favourable toward them ...they’re determined to keep their ‘cash cows’ in plain site ...so many ‘reporters’, I use that descriptive loosely for some, making healthy incomes from Meghan and Harry but are not held up to any standards for doing that...but the couple who have made a huge life decision of living their life their way, making their income their way, taking control of theirs and their family future etc etc...are almost daily scrutinised within an inch of their lives...not feeling negativity toward someone and not disliking them because that’s the place that the media try to lead to...doesn’t mean that there are thoughts of ‘perfection’ either...many, many people don’t live those extremes of one or the other...

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Do you actually understand or believe what you are saying?
These threads are actually about Harry’s and Meghans actions and choices!

The threads are not about racism mental health privacy wealth or any other subject in it’s entirety.

The fact that working class people choose to defend a billionaire and that they should have the money instead of charity is the biggest concern in my eyes.

People have been using the race card in order to try and shut people down but it’s simple not about race.

Lately I’m sharing more of my private life on here and for me it will never be and never has been about race

I’ve had a short but good physical relationship with a black South African woman who grew up in a hut I’ve got no hate in my heart towards people of colour.

I don’t think it’s about race, I think it’s mostly about loyalism/nationalism, blue-blood elitism, alongside a sprinkling of misogyny in the toxic tabloid press. Plus the big red faced cuck himself Piers Morgan perched right in the centre. There will be a race element for some but it’s not the main factor and it’s not what I see on here.

When I say it’s not about Harry and Meghan, I mean it’s not about them specifically as people. There seems to be a misunderstanding that the people fighting against the sneering monarchism are “Meghan fans” and “love Harry and Meghan so much” when it’s clearly got nothing to do with that. They could be anyone. The thing people have a problem with is the overall attitudes, not that they’re directed at someone specific.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I don’t think it’s about race, I think it’s mostly about loyalism/nationalism, blue-blood elitism, alongside a sprinkling of misogyny in the toxic tabloid press. Plus the big red faced cuck himself Piers Morgan perched right in the centre. There will be a race element for some but it’s not the main factor and it’s not what I see on here.

When I say it’s not about Harry and Meghan, I mean it’s not about them specifically as people. There seems to be a misunderstanding that the people fighting against the sneering monarchism are “Meghan fans” and “love Harry and Meghan so much” when it’s clearly got nothing to do with that. They could be anyone. The thing people have a problem with is the overall attitudes, not that they’re directed at someone specific.

Well those labels are new and original, I’ll give you that. The reasons people come up with as to why Meghan in particular isn’t liked are getting more and more outlandish.
Could you explain how what you have come up with has anything whatsoever to do with the ACTIONS of Meghan and Harry, and yes, Meghan in particular, past and present?
It’s how she behaves, the way she treats people, and all in all what an irritating, publicity and sympathy seeking person she is with a spectacular record of divisiveness in regard to her friends and her and Harry’s respective families and turning strangers against each other. She’s quite a fascinating study.
It could be anyone. High profile public figure Harry could have married Flossie Farkle and if she behaved like Meghan, we would be saying exactly the same about Flossie Farkle.

And really, I’m even more interested in people and how they react to it all on this forum than in Meghan or Harry themselves, believe it or not. I’m fascinated by peoples reactions to the whole ongoing saga. It’s a very illuminating phenomenon in that way.

[jet]

"There seems to be a misunderstanding that the people fighting against the sneering monarchism are “Meghan fans” and “love Harry and Meghan so much” when it’s clearly got nothing to do with that."

Furthermore TS, it clearly is for some.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

stop baiting

Right back at you.