[jet]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

The same day as Harry's mum announced her pregnancy with Harry? Pretty cute nod to his mum in my opinion. It's no secret that Harry adored his mum....quite the tribute announcing the pregnancy of his second child the way she did.

I'd rather give a pic taken by a pro than announce it and wait for a long range pap pic when I'm not looking my best. Surely that's common sense?

I READ that the Palace announced the pregnancy of Harry on the 13th Feb, the papers couldn't announce it until the next day, the 14th.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

They are his opinions, facts are facts and if he can't back it up then it's not a fact.

Making at that he is being attacked by people asking him to back up his claims in a debate thread is foolish.

... and that's exactly the point.

No one is expecting anyone to like them or dislike them.

I haven't seen a single thing said as to her doing wrong, being wrong or lying that has been substantiated.

So there's no real substantiated facts only whatever side of opinion there is on Meghan Markle and to a degree Prince Harry too.

However there's no way through that on closed thinking towards them.
To accuse someone of lying, you need to prove clearly they are.

Others have commented and said they see no evidence of her lying either.
Nor what wrong she's doing in fact.

I repeat those not accusing her of anything have nothing to have to prove.
Those who have accused her of lying, well they do, and have not.
They have not because they cannot.

I'm indifferent to them, Prince Harry and his Duchess are never going to impact on my life.
However, it's for them to choose their life and how they wish to conduct it.

As for the criticising of them for not being shut away in private, not seen or heard.
Well it seems that would leave a void in the lives of some UK citizens, who would be left with much less to talk about.

[Tom4784]

I'm just gonna keep saying it in these threads. Spend less time at being mad at Meghan Markle for existing, and focus that hate upon the peadophile prince that is being protected. How about we don't downplay or minimise a peadophile's actions so that we can continue to demonise a woman for everything she does, everything she doesn't do and everything we apparently decide she's responsible for because of reasons. we've invented on the spot.

[GoldHeart]

Do people want Meghan & Harry to be hermits and draw the curtains and never go outside ever again , because that's healthy isn't it .

[Ammi]

...it’s such a loving and wonderful tribute to Harry’s mother that the announcement of his birth and that of Archie’s sibling-to-be were on the same date, is it 37yrs apart...?...and so sad if the media are indeed somehow trying to take that away from them as well, if that’s how it is ..but I haven’t read that’s the case so I don’t know...and obviously 14th February being Valentine’s Day as well and ../...just all the perfect time to share their joy with the public and as much as they’re able to, to share it with his mother as well...obviously their new child won’t have a birth date anywhere near Harry’s because of the delay in announcing and I would think that be due to her previous miscarriage so a worrying time in early days as well..?....and also protecting Meghan from the sadly inevitable negativity that she’s getting now with certain media ...that was sadly always going to be...but their faces portray nothing but joy ....so hopefully in their new life, the relentless negative attention is impacting them so much less and they’re feeling more control in their lives...and I think for their own family and well being of, their decisions have been the right ones...

[jet]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Do people want Meghan & Harry to be hermits and draw the curtains and never go outside ever again , because that's healthy isn't it .

Of course not. If they stopped preaching and lecturing and being such hypocrites they would be liked more, I feel.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by jet

Of course not. If they stopped preaching and lecturing and being such hypocrites they would be liked more, I feel.

They were super popular, they could be again and now they have a host of new fans that never knew they existed a year ago, the world's their oyster
(if they tone down the preachy)

[jet]

Originally Posted by Cherie

They were super popular, they could be again and now they have a host of new fans that never knew they existed a year ago, the world's their oyster
(if they tone down the preachy)

I agree.

[Tom4784]

If it was me, I wouldn't particularly care about earning back the 'popularity' from people who hate me for existing more than a peadophile being shielded from justice.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

If it was me, I wouldn't particularly care about earning back the 'popularity' from people who hate me for existing more than a peadophile being shielded from justice.

I know right.

They’re already immensely popular anyway.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I think |it was Dan Wooton (now of GB News) called the pair professional victims and id imagine this will be the narrative with the fake interview.

[DouglasS]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I know right.

They’re already immensely popular anyway.

Popular

They’re basically controversial figures, when you ask the public they are split. Popular is being largely liked - aka William and Kate

[Alf]

There's more to all this than meets the eye.

I found it all very strange that Harry would up sticks and leave his family and duties.

I get the feeling that there's something we're not being told.

And when President Trump told Harry to, and I paraphrase "Be careful"

I said "hello! what's going on here then?"

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Alf

There's more to all this than meets the eye.

I found it all very strange that Harry would up sticks and leave his family and duties.

I get the feeling that there's something we're not being told.

And when President Trump told Harry to, and I paraphrase "Be careful"

I said "hello! what's going on here then?"

I think he wished him 'good luck'

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

Popular

They’re basically controversial figures, when you ask the public they are split. Popular is being largely liked - aka William and Kate

I dont know whether they are popular in the States....but their popularity here has dropped massively over the last year.

[Glenn.]

They’re only controversial to people who unnecessarily hate them...

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I dont know whether they are popular in the States....but their popularity here has dropped massively over the last year.

from what i can see they are not popular in the states either and this interview could really backfire

[Tom4784]

Dan Wootton is an abuser, not the best person to reference in terms of justifying hatred for Meghan, especially when people are ignoring Andrew to focus on her...

[bots]

americans loved Diana, so I am sure much of that love was passed on to Harry. People already knew Meghan from her minor tv role, so they will already have opinions on her good and bad, formed long before she met Harry

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

They’re only controversial to people who unnecessarily hate them...

A bit like Trump then?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Dan has joined Mailonline as well as the much anticipated GB NEWS

cant wait to read his articles after the interview

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I think |it was Dan Wooton (now of GB News) called the pair professional victims and id imagine this will be the narrative with the fake interview.

Probably. Meghan fighting back tears and and Oprah gazing at her with sad eyes and nodding along sympathetically.

[Tom4784]

A literal royal peadophile goes unpunished but god forbid someone who stepped away from royal duties does an interview with Oprah.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

A literal royal peadophile goes unpunished but god forbid someone who stepped away from royal duties does an interview with Oprah.

this thread is about meghan and harry

its nothing to do with prince andrew

[jet]

She wouldn’t have an interview with Oprah if she was just plain old Meghan Markle. She has never had any real appeal on her own merit, just another Hollywood wannabee who tried to make it big as an actress but a part in a cable tv show was as far as she got by the time she hit mid - thirties.
Harry is a blood prince but his forte and strength was always the army and all things associated with it, he isn’t qualified or experienced in anything else. His big appeal was his fun loving personality which is now gone.

This over privileged pair need to tone down their self - importance and arrogance and quietly get on with doing some actual worthwhile work which isn’t just about money grabbing or educating the peasants with their woke lectures. Respect and goodwill have to be earned as public figures, not expected as a god - given right.