[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I'm slowly beginning to believe that "Royal Commentators" are the actual worst of journalism. Really just painful.

Listen wake up, Meghan is putting it out there
She used her friends to put the contents of the letter to her father in the magazine

She is doing the same thing again. She sues anyone that puts her in a bad light so the friend has been given the nod

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Listen wake up, Meghan is putting it out there
She used her friends to put the contents of the letter to her father in the magazine

She is doing the same thing again. She sues anyone that puts her in a bad light so the friend has been given the nod

Oh no eek how will we stop her

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Oh no eek how will we stop her

Meghan needs to stop to be honest, let Harry reconnect with his family.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I'm slowly beginning to believe that "Royal Commentators" are the actual worst of journalism. Really just painful.

These award winning authors and journalists are just the worstest when they say what people don't want to hear.

Prince Harry: Conversations With The Prince by Angela Levin.
An eye-opening, monumental biography of Prince Harry by a veteran journalist on royal affairs who accompanied the prince on his royal duties for a year and was granted privileged access to his home in Kensington Palace. ..

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

These award winning authors and journalists are just the worstest when they say what people don't want to hear.

Prince Harry: Conversations With The Prince.
An eye-opening, monumental biography of Prince Harry by a veteran journalist on royal affairs who accompanied the prince on his royal duties for a year and was granted privileged access to his home in Kensington Palace. ..

They're the worst because they have a clear and demonstrated conflict of interests when they feel that their livelihood (the continuation of the royal institution) is being threatened.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

They're the worst because they have a clear and demonstrated conflict of interests when they feel that their livelihood (the continuation of the royal institution) is being threatened.

I doubt she was thinking "the Royal Institution is in imminent danger (which it most certainly is not) I must say something negative about Megs asap" when she gave her opinion.

[Glenn.]

Well the abuse Meghan gets, started WAY before the interview aired for a start but you know that so let’s not suggest it’s because of the interview.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Well the abuse Meghan gets, started WAY before the interview aired for a start but you know that so let’s not suggest it’s because of the interview.

She was greatly praised by many, including piers morgan.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

She was greatly praised by many, including piers morgan.

What has that got to do with what I said?

[Tom4784]

The hatred of Meghan Markle is just plain irrational. People are literally lying to themselves to justify their hatred.

[Marsh.]

They dedicated 70 years to it so it's perfect and not to be criticised, whilst Meghan should just suck it up and accept the lies being perpetuated in the media with no one speaking up on her behalf. Erm... no.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

They dedicated 70 years to it so it's perfect and not to be criticised, whilst Meghan should just suck it up and accept the lies being perpetuated in the media with no one speaking up on her behalf. Erm... no.

This is not a trick question marsh
Would you have done that interview?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

This is not a trick question marsh
Would you have done that interview?

Not sure of the relevance, but it's not a question I can answer as I haven't lived Harry or Meghan's life so have no basis to form that decision on.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Not sure of the relevance, but it's not a question I can answer as I haven't lived Harry or Meghan's life so have no basis to form that decision on.

I don't think any of us can know for certain unless we were in their shoes, being a public figure who's not only famous but part of the royals ,which plays a big part of it aswell.

[bots]

everyone knows the monarchy needs bringing up to date, it's been obvious for decades, but nothing will happen until the queen dies

[Tom4784]

Bigotry has always been a huge factor behind the hatred for Meghan, I think it's why most of the time, people seem to invent reasons to hate her, because they can't admit the real reasons are bigoted in nature. It's better to pretend she insulted the Queen or Prince Phillip then admit that the reason for the hate is because of her race, gender and/or her nationality.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

...



the reason for the hate is because of her race, gender and/or her nationality.

Thats how you like to see it....and maybe there are some that do but not on here. Meghan has done a number of things to give people a reason to dislike her and its nothing to do with her Race, Gender or Nationality.

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Thats how you like to see it....and maybe there are some that do but not on here. Meghan has done a number of things to give people a reason to dislike her and its nothing to do with her Race, Gender or Nationality.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Thats how you like to see it....and maybe there are some that do but not on here. Meghan has done a number of things to give people a reason to dislike her and its nothing to do with her Race, Gender or Nationality.

It's more interesting that you felt the need to clarify your own position, if the situation was reversed, I wouldn't feel the need to clarify because I knew a post like that wouldn't apply to me.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's more interesting that you felt the need to clarify your own position, if the situation was reversed, I wouldn't feel the need to clarify because I knew a post like that wouldn't apply to me.

[Cherie]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/...-have-23908802

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have "regrets" over the unfortunate timing of their interview with Oprah Winfrey, but insist they had no control over when it was aired.

Their explosive interview aired while Prince Philip was in hospital and Harry's grandfather has since passed away.

But while Meghan and Harry regret the timing of the interview, it is something they felt they had to do, a source close to the pair told Heat Magazine.

Harry had not seen the Duke of Edinburgh in over a year following his decision to quit the Royal Family and his life in the UK.

But he did have a close bond with the 99-year-old and spoke highly of him in the tell-all discussion with the US presenter.

And now a source close to Meghan and Harry has told how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex "wish things could have been different".

Oh dear, I thought it was all about control

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's more interesting that you felt the need to clarify your own position, if the situation was reversed, I wouldn't feel the need to clarify because I knew a post like that wouldn't apply to me.

Where did I insinuate I was "just clarifying my own position"....????

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Where did I insinuate I was "just clarifying my own position"....????

You didn't.

[thesheriff443]

The interview went down like a lead balloon and now they are back tracking

[thesheriff443]

Harry and William will not stand together at the funeral Peter Philips prince Anne’s son will stand between them on the wishes of the queen
And no one will wear military uniforms instead they will wear there medals on morning coats
Some say it’s to spare Harry as he would be the only one not in uniform