[Tom4784]

If only the media and the followers of their hate aimed that hate towards Andrew...

[Cherie]

I recall making a thread and Andrews interview with Emily Maitliss, it got about 5 replies, might try and find it to see who was actually interested in Andrew then

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Alf

A bit like Trump then?

Trump separated families and locked children in literal cages so id hazard a guess that any hatred aimed at him is deserved.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I recall making a thread and Andrews interview with Emily Maitliss, it got about 5 replies, might try and find it to see who was actually interested in Andrew then

Have you found it yet?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Trump separated families and locked children in literal cages so id hazard a guess that any hatred aimed at him is deserved.

And that's just a few of the horrendous things he did , not to mention the million other atrocities.

[joeysteele]

I agree with Dezzy re Prince Andrew however, I haven't made much on that because there's a case ongoing in that and he may yet be forced to give a further account of everything he knows.

It's then I'll perhaps have more to say of my own opinion on that.
He does seem to be being protected however.

As to Meghan Markle now we've moved on to if she wasn't with Harry, Oprah wouldn't want her on her show.

Oh come on for goodness sake.
Talk about clutching at straws now.

No substantiated evidence of her wrongdoing.
No substantiated evidence either of her lying.

How many people would never have got interviewed on a show who was just ordinary.
Who had no celebrity status or upped their status.

Of course Meghan Markle is a draw in part due to her now connection to Prince Harry.
There's nothing wrong at all in giving interviews if she WANTS to.
It's clear too, Prince Harry supports her too.

I wonder what he'd really like to say to those who are poking around, looking for near all she says and does just to criticise her for it.

Those who also seem to think they know what she'll say and how she'll act in an interview not yet taken place.

Talk about pre-judgement.
Yet this comes from adults too.
Unbelievable, in my personal view.

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Dan has joined Mailonline as well as the much anticipated GB NEWS

cant wait to read his articles after the interview

Is he the guy who used to be a straight - talking guest on Bit On The Side?
I'm going to start reading other articles and referring to them besides Royal reporters now, few appreciate proper research, its quite liberating!
I already love Piers articles!

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I agree with Dezzy re Prince Andrew however, I haven't made much on that because there's a case ongoing in that and he may yet be forced to give a further account of everything he knows.

It's then I'll perhaps have more to say of my own opinion on that.
He does seem to be being protected however.

As to Meghan Markle now we've moved on to if she wasn't with Harry, Oprah wouldn't want her on her show.

Oh come on for goodness sake.
Talk about clutching at straws now.

No substantiated evidence of her wrongdoing.
No substantiated evidence either of her lying.

How many people would never have got interviewed on a show who was just ordinary.
Who had no celebrity status or upped their status.

Of course Meghan Markle is a draw in part due to her now connection to Prince Harry.
There's nothing wrong at all in giving interviews if she WANTS to.
It's clear too, Prince Harry supports her too.

I wonder what he'd really like to say to those who are poking around, looking for near all she says and does just to criticise her for it.

Those who also seem to think they know what she'll say and how she'll act in an interview not yet taken place.

Talk about pre-judgement.
Yet this comes from adults too.
Unbelievable, in my personal view.

It’s the pre judgement and the assumptions that have been made that are laughable. All done by people that don’t know her.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Trump separated families and locked children in literal cages so id hazard a guess that any hatred aimed at him is deserved.

It's beyond belief to see such a comparison Glenn.
It's amazing that point and horrendous act by him gets overlooked.

Yet constant criticism of the Duchess of Sussex is played out like a sick game.
Rather than condemn the sick actions in power of a political near madman.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

And that's just a few of the horrendous things he did , not to mention the million other atrocities.

Oh come on..



That's ridiculous to say, atrocities, for real

With Myanmar and the likes going on..

Your calling atrocities on a president that's used his power to reach out to enemies for peace n stability

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

If only the media and the followers of their hate aimed that hate towards Andrew...

Whilst the case is being investigated...and since his awful interview...Andrew has been kept away from the media. Until he re-emerges or the case comes back in the spotlight..then there is nothing to discuss at the moment.

Whilst Megan and Harry keep putting themselves out to the media...they will continue to attract debate...both good and bad.

[jet]

I wonder why Harry is only coming out near the end of the interview as has been reported?

[Beso]

Originally Posted by jet

I wonder why Harry is only coming out near the end of the interview as has been reported?

Maybe he has reasons to stay out the limelight like his favourite uncle.

[Glenn.]

I’m sure Meghan absolutely demanded to be spotlight and made poor Harry sit on the sidelines.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Oh come on..



That's ridiculous to say, atrocities, for real

With Myanmar and the likes going on..

Your calling atrocities on a president that's used his power to reach out to enemies for peace n stability

His behaviour in the election alone was disturbing and don't pretend he didn't incite violence with the capitol attack .

alot of republicans were embarrassed
Even Pence must of been red faced . Not to mention other people who were thinking WTF is wrong with this man .

There's throwing a tantrum like a child and then there's this ,and should of faced the consequences but Trump being Trump gets away with everything .

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

I’m sure Meghan absolutely demanded to be spotlight and made poor Harry sit on the sidelines.

undoubtedly

[Beso]

He spoke like any other us president would have by simply using national rehtoric language.and was not found in impeachment.

So keep pretending.

[Glenn.]

Let’s get back on topic please and stop talking about that orange little man

[Beso]

Topic is..meghan and harry do an oprah interview.

Please..fgs glenn

Let us deviate a little.Just for a bit...I beg ya.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I recall making a thread and Andrews interview with Emily Maitliss, it got about 5 replies, might try and find it to see who was actually interested in Andrew then

What a silly thing to say and do.

How can you possibly hope to gleam interest by just looking at a thread that could have slipped under the radar, or was buried by more active threads at time? You're basically saying that unless a person posts in a certain thread, at a certain time, then they can never take an interest or a stance in the subject matter, a foolish argument to make.

Instead of always trying to invalidate opinions through lazy and ilogical methods, you should actually just try to argue against what they are saying, It's not that hard.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Whilst the case is being investigated...and since his awful interview...Andrew has been kept away from the media. Until he re-emerges or the case comes back in the spotlight..then there is nothing to discuss at the moment.

Whilst Megan and Harry keep putting themselves out to the media...they will continue to attract debate...both good and bad.

Nah, I don't think peadophiles being out of sight and out of mind is a good thing, and there's a lot more to discuss about the Royal family and the government protecting a peadophile when compared with analysing every breath Meghan takes to come up with a new way of of how she's going to bring about the end of reality.

There's 'nothing happening' because people are too easily distracted, the outrage towards Andrew should be neverending, he is a child rapist for god's sake but people keep trying to move the discussion towards a couple who decided to peace out on being royals. It's easy to cover up what he's done when people are more concerned with hating a woman who simply married into a family.

[Josy]

Stick to the topic in here instead of constantly making it about other members

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Nah, I don't think peadophiles being out of sight and out of mind is a good thing, and there's a lot more to discuss about the Royal family and the government protecting a peadophile when compared with analysing every breath Meghan takes to come up with a new way of of how she's going to bring about the end of reality.

There's 'nothing happening' because people are too easily distracted, the outrage towards Andrew should be neverending, he is a child rapist for god's sake but people keep trying to move the discussion towards a couple who decided to peace out on being royals. It's easy to cover up what he's done when people are more concerned with hating a woman who simply married into a family.

Why would paedophiles be out of sight and out of mind ...a stupid thing to say. Andrew will get what’s coming to him...but this thread isn’t about him.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

I wonder why Harry is only coming out near the end of the interview as has been reported?

It’s not about him....it’s all about me me me Meghan...

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

It’s not about him....it’s all about me me me Meghan...

She likes to make Harry feel useful though, she lets him carry her handbag.