Home Menu

Site Navigation


Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Today, 12:11 AM #326
arista's Avatar
arista arista is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 191,360
arista arista is online now
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 191,360
Default

arista is online now  
Old Today, 01:29 AM #327
GiRTh's Avatar
GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,295

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


GiRTh GiRTh is offline
Iconic Symbolic Historic
GiRTh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,295

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Jess Impiazzi
Strictly 2017: Davood Ghadami


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bots View Post
i'm supporting the removal of a cruel terrorist regime. However, I don't think this will be the end of the story, just the nature of the threat will change.

The people can't rise up against 500,000 armed regime supporters. I also have no idea what the Shah's grandson is doing. Does he think people have forgotten how corrupt the Shah's regime was
I acknowledge that Iran’s former leadership was brutal, but I keep coming back to the same question: is it really the responsibility of the USA and Europe to intervene—and for what benefit? What do we actually gain by entering yet another conflict in the Middle East? In the short term, I don’t see any obvious advantages for our security, our economy, or our political stability.

History hasn’t treated these interventions kindly. We remove one regime, only for another group to fill the vacuum—often just as untrustworthy, sometimes even worse. It can take years, sometimes a decade or more, before the West even begins to understand the new power structure, let alone influence it. And during that entire period, it’s ordinary people who suffer the consequences.

That’s what concerns me most. People are dying right now, and once a war begins, it becomes incredibly difficult to control or contain. Conflicts like this escalate quickly, and as more civilians are killed, the pressure to retaliate—officially or unofficially—only increases. That’s how small wars turn into regional ones.

So yes, Iran has been a problem for a long time. But does that automatically make it our responsibility to “liberate” them? And what does liberation even look like when there are still half a million armed loyalists to the regime? These are the questions no one seems willing to address, yet they’re the ones that matter most.
__________________
Quote:
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you. - Don Marquis
GiRTh is offline  
Old Today, 02:49 AM #328
arista's Avatar
arista arista is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 191,360
arista arista is online now
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 191,360
Default

Yes,
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
was established 46 years ago.

Above the Army.


Of Course,
President Trump is not looking at that long history.


So 4 or 5 more weeks of Intense Bombing
will look like another Iraqi mess.
to be honest
arista is online now  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
attack, bombed, bombs, daylight, dead, iran, israel, tehran, troops, usa


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts