[arista]

[Beso]

Nicola sturgeon mouthing off about Boris suckling up to trump, forgetting the only UK country he has managed to wangle a golf course out off and a private landing area for himself is in fact her bonnie wee scotland..

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Brexit is going to cost £70b.

[The Slim Reaper]

[user104658]

Surely it's worth pointing out that most full-time 9-5 jobs only pay 35 hours (sometimes 37.5 hrs) already? Hardly anywhere pays lunch break these days so 8 hour days x 5 days rarely pay 40 hours...

I wonder if the idea of a 32 hour work week is based on 4 days 9-5 but making the lunch break paid?

I personally think unpaid breaks are ridiculous in many ways anyway, everyone working a full day should be entitled to a PAID break.

As things stand though, I can't see how a 4 day working week translates to 32 hours. It would be 28 hours or 30 hours, depending on if lunch break is 30 mins or an hour.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Brexit is going to cost £70b.

Over how many years ?

[arista]

She is Live
all media and Radio 5
Not LBC.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Over how many years ?

Every year with Johnson's deal.

[Nicky91]

brexit has already cost britain lots of money, lots of chaos too

2016 referendum to leave EU, 3 yrs later came close to leaving on october 31st, didn't happen

what a joke (but not surprising, you Always get chaos if there is divide)

[Beso]

Originally Posted by arista

She is Live
all media and Radio 5
Not LBC.

I thought shed be busy making suspicious packages!

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Every year with Johnson's deal.

So 10 years then?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

So 10 years then?

That would be £700 billion over 10 years.

[arista]

Corbyn is Live now in Harlow

BBCNewsHD
SkyNewsHD

[arista]

Originally Posted by parmnion

I thought shed be busy making suspicious packages!

Yes they say they got a Package with fake powder in it.

[Twosugars]

Boris Johnson was on Monday night accused of presiding over a cover-up after it emerged that No 10 refused to clear the publication of a potentially incendiary report examining Russian infiltration in British politics, including the Conservative party
The Guardian

[arista]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

Boris Johnson was on Monday night accused of presiding over a cover-up after it emerged that No 10 refused to clear the publication of a potentially incendiary report examining Russian infiltration in British politics, including the Conservative party
The Guardian

Yes Accused
but nothing is going to go public
at a Election
of course............................................ .......

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes Accused
but nothing is going to go public
at a Election
of course............................................ .......

Downplaying an act of covering up a report that could inform the voting public about how the election could be corrupted by outside forces?

Why are you valuing a party over protecting the sanctity of your own vote?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Downplaying an act of covering up a report that could inform the voting public about how the election could be corrupted by outside forces?

Why are you valuing a party over protecting the sanctity of your own vote?

Just stating the Facts...............

[arista]

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Downplaying an act of covering up a report that could inform the voting public about how the election could be corrupted by outside forces?

Why are you valuing a party over protecting the sanctity of your own vote?

Same reason he stopped talking when I told him johnsons deal is £70b per year. Facts are meaningless when it disproves wish fulfillment.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Same reason he stopped talking when I told him johnsons deal is £70b per year. Facts are meaningless when it disproves wish fulfillment.

Thats not a Fact.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Thats not a Fact.

It's what the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) are claiming (it's the best, non-partisan guesstimate we have) . You won't even acknowledge that it's impossible for us to get a deal as good as staying in the EU.

Let's say that it was an absolute fact that even Johnson agreed with, would you then be against brexit?

[arista]

(non-partisan guesstimate we have)

Yes assumption a "Guess"


You keep them
they are Not Facts.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

(non-partisan guesstimate we have)

Yes assumption a "Guess"


You keep them
they are Not Facts.

While you post the guesstimate costings of everything labour want to do. So if everyone agreed it would cost £70b/yr, would you then be anti-brexit? You didn't answer the question.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

While you post the guesstimate costings of everything labour want to do. So if everyone agreed it would cost £70b/yr, would you then be anti-brexit? You didn't answer the question.

No
as it not Facts
its a Guess
for Folks like you