About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

joeysteele · 31-03-2021, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

What you said about Prince Edward sounds familiar, it might just be because I've heard it before on these threads.

But anyway it just once again proves that mental health is seen as some kind of 'weakness' in the eyes of the royal institution & of course the press will always be spiteful .

Once more very cold unfeeling attitude which again correlates to what Meghan & Harry have been saying.

It was before I was born so I've relied on my Mum's accounting of this, as she liked Prince Edward of them all.

Apparently his costs at Uni were covered in part by the forces on condition of his future service to them.

He hated being in it and came out to a fair barracking.
According to my Mum, it was Prince Philip who was reported to have probably berated him so much that he was really upset.

I'll take my Mum's word on it for sure.

Tom4784 · 31-03-2021, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

People are sick of the cry babies like Meghan and Harry so yes if they don’t like it the can leave and boot lick that pair for the rest of their sad lives

We get it, you don't like free speech.

rusticgal · 31-03-2021, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Oh I need no lecture from you on misinformation.

Because no one on here has any real insight into the workings of the Royals.
My Mother states, Prince Edward's distress at being forced to do his service was clear in his face.

If your mother says it...it must be true then.

joeysteele · 31-03-2021, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal

If your mother says it...it must be true then.

Well much like myself.
She didn't just take tabloid reporting.
She was there for the more official news bulletins.

I've just a moment ago checked up a bit on it and she's just about spot on from what I could find..

If you can only come back with sarcasm I think I'd prefer you didn't, with respect.
I'll believe my own Mother thank you.
Regardless of your sarcasm.

GoldHeart · 31-03-2021, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal

If your mother says it...it must be true then.

Because tabloids are more accurate aren't they ?!?

arista · 31-03-2021, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

So Meghan Lied on that CBS Interview
She claimed they got married 3 days
before the Official Wedding,

The clip shown on Ch5HD Live AM
In todays papers the Archbishop of Canterbury
said he did not Marry them,
it would have been illegal.

user104658 · 31-03-2021, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

They can only judge what the two gobs told their mate

joeysteele · 31-03-2021, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista

Of course the Windsor castle marriage is the legal one where they signed the documents.

That doesn't mean their own private commitment to each other wasn't done verbally before.
They'll have gone through possibly rehearsal of their vows to one another.

In fact the Archbishop states, he WAS with the couple in a PRIVATE and PASTORAL setting beforehand.
That means OFFICIAL religious and church matters, requiring a Minister of the church to be there.

I don't think that's hard to understand, they'd gone through a dress rehearsal before the day.
There they committed their vows to each other.

Then the official confirmation of the necessary legal ceremony following on.
That's how I can see it to be in my opinion.

I see nothing to make a meal of myself as to that.

rusticgal · 31-03-2021, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Of course the Windsor castle marriage is the legal one where they signed the documents.

That doesn't mean their own private commitment to each other wasn't done verbally before.
They'll have gone through possibly rehearsal of their vows to one another.

In fact the Archbishop states, he WAS with the couple in a PRIVATE and PASTORAL setting beforehand.
That means OFFICIAL religious and church matters, requiring a Minister of the church to be there.

I don't think that's hard to understand, they'd gone through a dress rehearsal before the day.
There they committed their vows to each other.

Then the official confirmation of the necessary legal ceremony following on.
I see nothing'to make a meal of myself as to that.

The point being that Meghan said "We were married 3 days before...no one knows that"....she lied.. simples. Then they had to correct it. One of several misinterpretations..

GoldHeart · 31-03-2021, 02:26 PM

I don't know why it's so hard to grasp a legal ceremony aswell as a private vows setting .

joeysteele · 31-03-2021, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I don't know why it's so hard to grasp a legal ceremony aswell as a private vows setting .

Waste of time trying to explain it GoldHeart.
It's pretty easy to grasp for me to see no doubt.

I guess it's a case of not wanting to even try to understand that for some.

Ammi · 31-03-2021, 02:29 PM

...it’s all down to individual States in the USA, I believe ...but for most, once all of the documents are presented etc then the actual ceremony itself can take place anywhere...in a private home or wherever...that’ s not the case here so I think she’s obviously confused that it wasn’t the actual ceremony, but a blessing, type thing...We can probably blame Harry, I think...for not explaining the U.K. laws so clearly...but wedding planning haze and stress....ughhhh, so much in their heads I would say...

The Slim Reaper · 31-03-2021, 02:33 PM

Maybe as a modern, young couple, they had a humanist ceremony that completely did away with any church participation?

thesheriff443 · 31-03-2021, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Waste of time trying to explain it GoldHeart.
It's pretty easy to grasp for me to see no doubt.

I guess it's a case of not wanting to even try to understand that for some.

There is a difference to exchanging vows and getting married one might be more personal but it’s not legal

So in the eyes of the law they were not legally married so telling someone you are married when. You are not is telling a lie

Of which they have told many

Cherie · 31-03-2021, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Maybe as a modern, young couple, they had a humanist ceremony that completely did away with any church participation?

Why say it was just them and the Archbishop then?

user104658 · 31-03-2021, 03:05 PM

Quote:

A spokesperson for the couple said they had "privately exchanged personal vows a few days before their official/legal wedding on May 19."

Meghan said “The vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury.”

There is literally NOTHING difficult to understand about this, and Meghan only mentioned the vows nothing about the legal certificate.

It's quite plainly obvious that what happened was a personal, private exchange of vows away from the press and cameras before the main televised "event" 3 days later, after which the papers were actually signed. There's nothing unusual about them as a couple considering their "real" wedding to be the private one they wanted, rather than the official technicalities of the "showy" day. Love how people feel entitled to say "Umm NAH your real wedding was the one we watched and you get no say in that".

Just more of this ownership delusion, yet again.

Alf · 31-03-2021, 03:08 PM

Meghan reminds me of Jay from the Inbetweeners.

GoldHeart · 31-03-2021, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alf

Meghan reminds me of Jay from the Inbetweeners.

I don't remember hearing Meghan call people "bus wnkrs" & "clunge"
But whatever

jet · 31-03-2021, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

It was before I was born so I've relied on my Mum's accounting of this, as she liked Prince Edward of them all.

Apparently his costs at Uni were covered in part by the forces on condition of his future service to them.

He hated being in it and came out to a fair barracking.
According to my Mum, it was Prince Philip who was reported to have probably berated him so much that he was really upset.

I'll take my Mum's word on it for sure.

Nobody said that Prince Philip didn't berate him, did they? You are just clouding the issue as if someone questioned that, when they did not.
The only thing corrected was your statement that "Also Prince Edward FORCED in the name of duty, to complete his military service" which was completely untrue. If it was your mother told you that, she was wrong on that one.

jet · 31-03-2021, 03:43 PM

"We exchanged vows 3 days before we got married" would be the truth.
"We got married 3 days before, nobody knows that" would be a lie.
Meghan lied.

jet · 31-03-2021, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

I don't remember hearing Meghan call people "bus wnkrs" & "clunge"
But whatever

She does have a potty mouth with the cussin' though, she said so herself on her TIG blog - and biting her nails.

Josy · 31-03-2021, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

"We exchanged vows 3 days before we got married" would be the truth.

"We got married 3 days before, nobody knows that" would be a lie.

Meghan lied.

It's the same thing...

Lots of couples do it.

bots · 31-03-2021, 04:15 PM

i still cant fathom why the interview was a big deal. It hasn't hurt the monarchy and who really cares what they had to say? I still haven't watched it, and I don't intend to.

When Diana died there was a very real prospect that the monarchy would never recover, this is just nothing like that

joeysteele · 31-03-2021, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

Nobody said that Prince Philip didn't berate him, did they? You are just clouding the issue as if someone questioned that, when they did not.
The only thing corrected was your statement that "Also Prince Edward FORCED in the name of duty, to complete his military service" which was completely untrue. If it was your mother told you that, she was wrong on that one.

If you look it up properly you will find the Marines paid part of his Uni time,ON CONDITION he DID service with them.
I say you are wrong, IN MY VIEW.
Just as you'll do your utmost to discredit me, WRONGLY.

You can twist and squirm all you like but debating with you is a total waste of time in my view.
I'll add with respect, but then you just to possibly argue, you'll throw back to me that's an insult.
As you even think the word unbelievable is an insult.

I totally, and with respect, refuse to waste any of my time even trying to reason with you.
So if you respond again.
I will just ignore you.

So I terminate my end of this conversation with you now.
No matter what you try to come back and bait with again.
With my apologies to Josy for feeling the need to make this post on this her new thread.

However I will defend myself against anyone questioning my integrity.