About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

BB22 · 08-08-2009, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Libra

Quote:

Originally posted by VickyJ

Quote:

Originally posted by Bradley.
Utter bollockss, it was no fix.

ange7 · 08-08-2009, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7

Quote:

Originally posted by Bradley.
Utter bollockss, it was no fix.

agree
rubbish thread

It was on the part of Big Brother. They basically removed the possibility of any of the bigger characters being evicted by putting them all up and making it a vote to save.

I think that was rather unfair on the likes of Hira, who haven't had the same opportunities to make an impression on the audience, whether that would have been good or bad.

It wasn't an even playing field to begin with and I found it ridiculous that they were even up for eviction in the first place, considering it was two people who were to blame.

Big Brother manipulated the rules to satisfy their own needs. Can't be doing that anymore cuz it plays into the hands of Marcus and Siavash and the like. The housemates will play up again if they're not careful.

bb put them all up for the $$$ not to help Bea. That was reallynow's point. BB gave the public the choice...was that a fix? lol
The vote to save thing isn't new nor is the idea of bb getting rid of boring characters. Hira was super sweet but not the least bit entertaining. Seeing this as a FIX is way off the mark. Reallynow's idea that it's a setup specifically to help Bea is bizarre

BB22 · 08-08-2009, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Libra

Quote:

Originally posted by VickyJ
The funny thing is, it would never have been hira, if people didnt decide to try and vote tactically...

That as well...

Indeed. I think Lisa's new "fans" played a part in Hira's eviction with their attempt to get Bea out.

ange7 · 08-08-2009, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by reallynow

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7

Quote:

Originally posted by Bradley.
Utter bollockss, it was no fix.

agree
rubbish thread

It was on the part of Big Brother. They basically removed the possibility of any of the bigger characters being evicted by putting them all up and making it a vote to save.

I think that was rather unfair on the likes of Hira, who haven't had the same opportunities to make an impression on the audience, whether that would have been good or bad.

It wasn't an even playing field to begin with and I found it ridiculous that they were even up for eviction in the first place, considering it was two people who were to blame.

Big Brother manipulated the rules to satisfy their own needs. Can't be doing that anymore cuz it plays into the hands of Marcus and Siavash and the like. They'll do it again if they're not careful.

Thank you a very well written post, the GULLIBLE CHAVS in our society cannot comprehend they are that stupid.

calling me a stupid GULLIBLE CHAV?

Vicky. · 08-08-2009, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7

Quote:

Originally posted by reallynow

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7

Quote:

Originally posted by Bradley.
Utter bollockss, it was no fix.

agree
rubbish thread

It was on the part of Big Brother. They basically removed the possibility of any of the bigger characters being evicted by putting them all up and making it a vote to save.

I think that was rather unfair on the likes of Hira, who haven't had the same opportunities to make an impression on the audience, whether that would have been good or bad.

It wasn't an even playing field to begin with and I found it ridiculous that they were even up for eviction in the first place, considering it was two people who were to blame.

Big Brother manipulated the rules to satisfy their own needs. Can't be doing that anymore cuz it plays into the hands of Marcus and Siavash and the like. They'll do it again if they're not careful.

Thank you a very well written post, the GULLIBLE CHAVS in our society cannot comprehend they are that stupid.

calling me a stupid GULLIBLE CHAV?

Everyone who doesnt believe this stupid consipracy theory is a gullible chav...by the looks of it

setanta · 08-08-2009, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7

Quote:

Originally posted by setanta

Quote:

Originally posted by ange7

Quote:

Originally posted by Bradley.
Utter bollockss, it was no fix.

agree
rubbish thread

It was on the part of Big Brother. They basically removed the possibility of any of the bigger characters being evicted by putting them all up and making it a vote to save.

I think that was rather unfair on the likes of Hira, who haven't had the same opportunities to make an impression on the audience, whether that would have been good or bad.

It wasn't an even playing field to begin with and I found it ridiculous that they were even up for eviction in the first place, considering it was two people who were to blame.

Big Brother manipulated the rules to satisfy their own needs. Can't be doing that anymore cuz it plays into the hands of Marcus and Siavash and the like. The housemates will play up again if they're not careful.

bb put them all up for the $$$ not to help Bea. That was reallynow's point. BB gave the public the choice...was that a fix? lol
The vote to save thing isn't new nor is the idea of bb getting rid of boring characters. Hira was super sweet but not the least bit entertaining. Seeing this as a FIX is way off the mark. Reallynow's idea that it's a setup specifically to help Bea is fruit loop material.

Oh I'm not suggesting that this was done for the sole purpose of securing Bea's position in the house; I just feel that Big Brother are asking for trouble when they carelessly manipulate the rules and reveal obvious favouritism in their pursuit of some extra dough.

Jack_ · 08-08-2009, 01:23 PM

Yeah, brilliant isn't it? Finally the bores are leaving when they should.

setanta · 08-08-2009, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jack_
Yeah, brilliant isn't it? Finally the bores are leaving when they should.

I don't think so. Not what Big Brother was originally conceived as. It was about mistrust, gameplaying and a tactical battle; always aware that the eyes are on you, watching.

Big Brother should always be in the position of power but by just throwing them all up carelessly for eviction you essentially destroy the control that the producers have on the show and turn it into a silly popularity contest. Big Brothers iron fist becomes a soft little pillow.

You see, the next batch of contestants for next years programme will learn from Marcus and Siavash and act in the same manner when they believe that there's others in a more precarious position. I just think Big Brother are playing with fire here.

BJ · 08-08-2009, 02:08 PM

I'm glad BB did it. I'm glad Hira has gone.

Shasown · 08-08-2009, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bigbrother301

Quote:

Originally posted by reallynow

Quote:

Originally posted by bigbrother301
total rubbish. that pleb broke rules. that pleb was up with bea. but because half the british public are just like that pleb marcus. they obv get rid of the hm that was providing us veiwing public the most entertainment.

Marcus and Bea arent entertaining and you have only contridicted yourself and proved my theory RIGHT!

can you not understand english. i was sayin marcus n siavash broke rules, marcus n bea up. and hira is out. im saying it was the wrong person evicted. i wanted bea or marcus to go. so i ahve not contridicted myself. you just dont understand.

English? PMSL