Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-04-2011, 11:17 AM #26
Livia's Avatar
Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 34,978


Livia Livia is offline
Flag shagger.
Livia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brasov, Transylvania
Posts: 34,978


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky. View Post
Yeah...as if the female got pregnant chance are the baby would have all sorts of problems :/

They can be vile all they want, but no need to pass problems onto a baby through it all.
Does this hysterical knee-jerk reaction actually relate to anyone in particular? Or is the question hypothetical? In either case, if you're going to forcibly sterilise someone because "chances are" they may have a baby with "all sorts of problems", are you also going to sterilise people who have a genetic disease that may be passed on? How about drug adicts who get pregnant? Are you going to sterlise them too?
Livia is offline  
Old 27-04-2011, 01:11 PM #27
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,810


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,810


Default

Hardly the same thing though is it...people born with a genetic disease cant actually help it. You CAN help having sex with a relative.

Meh, I dont know the exact statistics or anything. I think incest makes you 3 times more likely to have a baby with defects or something. If you want to shag your sister/brother, get on with it, but dont pass problems on to innocent people through your **** ups.
Vicky. is offline  
Old 29-04-2011, 10:10 PM #28
bananarama's Avatar
bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
bananarama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu View Post
Why should two consenting adults be sent to prison for having sex? It doesn't matter how disgusting I find it. They are consenting. It's none of my business.
For once I agree with you.......Prison won't solve that problem. Neither will seeing a shrink. Incest is a perverted form of sexuality and you can't change that.......
bananarama is offline  
Old 30-04-2011, 11:13 AM #29
Shasown's Avatar
Shasown Shasown is offline
Account Vacant
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In my house.
Posts: 9,351
Shasown Shasown is offline
Account Vacant
Shasown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In my house.
Posts: 9,351
Default

Are people sent to prison nowadays for committing Incest? Offhand I cant recalll any cases recently in the UK where people have been prosecuted and then sentenced to prison for committing Incest, though some people have had the charge included in other charges lists like rape sexual assualt etc.

Todays justice system doesnt always prosecute people who transgress slightly outdated laws.
Shasown is offline  
Old 30-04-2011, 11:39 AM #30
Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Pyramid* Pyramid* is offline
Pyramid*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,528


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
Does this hysterical knee-jerk reaction actually relate to anyone in particular? Or is the question hypothetical? In either case, if you're going to forcibly sterilise someone because "chances are" they may have a baby with "all sorts of problems", are you also going to sterilise people who have a genetic disease that may be passed on? How about drug adicts who get pregnant? Are you going to sterlise them too?
Knee jerk reaction?


http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3...347-8/abstract

Quote:
Twenty-nine children of brother-sister or father-daughter matings were studied. Twenty-one were ascertained because of the history of incest, eight because of signs or symptoms in the child. In the first group of 21 children, 12 had abnormalities, which were severe in nine (43%). In one of these the disorder was autosomal recessive. All eight of the group referred with signs or symptoms had abnormalities, three from recessive disorders. The high empiric risk for severe problems in the children of such close consanguineous matings should be borne in mind, as most of these infants are relinquished for adoption.
Pyramid* is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
brothers, prison, sex, sisters


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts