[Lostie!]

From another gay guy, I find more natural looking girls prettier. Charlie, for example.

[Vicky.]

As a straight female I think both would look better with less/no makeup.

Sallie overdoes it a lot

However Hazel looks good even with all the slap.

[Marsh.]

Hazel looks stunning either way.

Sallie looks like **** either way.

But, yes, as a rule too much makeup is not attractive.

[King Gizzard]

I don't find Hazel attractive as it is, even if she didn't have makeup, there's something weird about her face. Something 53 year old-who's-had-too-much-surgery about it

Sallie would probably be alright with out it but still don't see the fuss

charlie

[karezza]

Sallie, Gina and Hazel are horrible. Charlie is lovely.

[Dash Darington]

The make up is bad, but the plastic surgery is worse. I wish women would clue in as to how primitive plastic surgery is at this stage. It's like offering to have your face redrawn by a kindergartner. They're both ruined.

[Bluerang1]

Sallie looks like a natural beauty and so does Hazel. I don't like the make-up, especially with Gina. They're all attractive to me though.

[Raph]

I completely agree, they both look much better without being so caked in make-up

[rionablue]

I noticed that Hazel has pretty bad skin ( spots and stuff) which we all get from time to time ( I suffered alot from it when I was younger) She had no makeup on her a few nights ago and I noticed it. In that case I think she needs to put on a little more than would be the norm just to feel secure about how she looks. I have no opinion on Sallie whatseover. Hazel is beautiful and has the most amazing eyes

[Roy Mars III]

They both look great, they are both better looking than Charlie (though she is pretty as well)