[Razor]

Yes I would happily pay for 24/7 live feed.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Yup, and I'd watch it when something big happens which I'd know because I'm sure someone would post about it on here or DS

[smeagol]

you would have to pay me if all they show is eating

[Marcus.]

Originally Posted by smeagol

you would have to pay me if all they show is eating

aye

[SillyTilly]

If it was around a Fiver then I probably would yes. But it would have to be 24 Hours a Day

[Indy]

I have for the US feeds in the past, and at the time it was around £6.50/month or you could do 3 months in advance for £26. The downside is the company that hosted it made it nearly impossible to cancel the subscription, and you'd have to call and argue with them to make them stop charging you after the show was over.

It's been a few years since I've bothered, and it's not really 24/7 coverage. Instead of birdsong, we have a fishtank with a "we'll be right back" message. There have been times the feed was nothing but fish for 2 days straight because they wanted to keep a twist a secret, even though everyone paid for the time. It's also fish during the live shows and during certain competitions, as well as any time someone mentions a person they're not cleared to talk about on the air or sings a song.

ETA: just noticed there's something wrong with my math there, someone who's better at it - $10/month, $25/3 months.

[Ramsay]

i'd stream the **** out of it. so technically i'd be paying for the electricity bill, so yes i would

[Gillian-73]

I'd pay a tenner
Edit... If it was 24/7