[MrWong]

Originally Posted by cfromhx02

It was noticeable tonight how there was no noticeable sucking up to Gina on BBBOTS,means they know she's guilty tonight I think, and good that the whole panel defended Charlie , when they all know it's a den of Gina supporters and BB staff suck ups to Gina supporters,

There was barely any discussion about Gina so what exactly could the BOTS crowd react to? Oh and by the way, the crowd can support more than one housemate.

but none of the panel had the courage to say they'd seen Gina misrepresenting Charlie and seen her stirring things up and steeping back to smirk and laugh at the fight afterward.

The panel not slagging off Gina means they lack courage? Far more likely that they didn't see Gina's role as significant in the grand scheme of things.

But what was behind the BS from one of Gina's supporters who said Hazel was the one who had removed the pin from the handgranade and stepped back to enjoy the chaos afterward.

And what was behind the psyh who said that Hazel was the 1 who had reined in the dogs to encircle Charlie then let them loose to attack.

Didn't these people watch the same programme ?

Hazel was rattled by the nom's so threw her bessy under the bus. Much like Charlie did.

And particularly despicable that the psych who's on the staff was misrepresenting who caused the aggro,

or were they deliberately lying to make out Hazel had caused the trouble.

Surely they all saw it was Gina who started it and who misrepresented Charlie that she reigned them in then let them loose and it was her that stepped back to laugh ?

The F&F nom's caused the trouble. Pretty obvious I would have thought.

[barbel13]

To be fair for Sam it was difficult to catch up and understand when a group argue at the same time due to his hearing problem.So this is not his cup of tea.Sam will express himself on one to one argument but not group argument.Dex to win.

[Lex]

Originally Posted by barbel13

To be fair for Sam it was difficult to catch up and understand when a group argue at the same time due to his hearing problem.So this is not his cup of tea.Sam will express himself on one to one argument but not group argument.Dex to win.

To be fair barbel...Sam didn't need to keep up with what was said to show compassion to a 'friend in distress' did he..?
All he had to do was follow her into the bedroom as "The cold hearted rat Dexter" [as his detractors would portray him] did, and offer a shoulder to cry on!...but did we see any of the expected 'friend-etiquette' displayed by Sam?...did we hell!...we saw a display of the boy's gameplan to keep away from anything that might be unpopular with both the other housemates and more importantly....the voting public!...it's accumulation of niggly little things like this that has put the boy right down in my estimation in the last couple of weeks barbel..I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with "playing the game to win"...[and it might just be the fact that 'his sincere-lad act' had me fooled for weeks?] but this level of sneakyness is too much for me!....I no longer want him to win, and refuse to brush his bad points off as "Well ..it's harder for lovely Sam!"..

Cheers.

[Livia]

I've given up watching this abortion of a show. They've acted outrageously to Hazel, and they had the audacity to have a dispicable touch-feely interview with Daley. And that horrible old harridan on there last night, Carole... just before they went to a break saying that Hazel was responsible for Daley being thrown out". *******ing outrageous. That old bag is supposed to be a Sexual Health Worker. What does she say to the boys? Do anything you like to the girls, we can blame them for your bad behaviour afterwards.

[Speedster]

Originally Posted by Livia

I've given up watching this abortion of a show. They've acted outrageously to Hazel, and they had the audacity to have a dispicable touch-feely interview with Daley. And that horrible old harridan on there last night, Carole... just before they went to a break saying that Hazel was responsible for Daley being thrown out". *******ing outrageous. That old bag is supposed to be a Sexual Health Worker. What does she say to the boys? Do anything you like to the girls, we can blame them for your bad behaviour afterwards.

I heard her say that too, the silly woman (I'm being polite.) And I think you've got a really good point about the kind of message it sends out-namely that the guys can do what they want because society just blames women. Disgraceful.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Livia

I've given up watching this abortion of a show. They've acted outrageously to Hazel, and they had the audacity to have a dispicable touch-feely interview with Daley. And that horrible old harridan on there last night, Carole... just before they went to a break saying that Hazel was responsible for Daley being thrown out". *******ing outrageous. That old bag is supposed to be a Sexual Health Worker. What does she say to the boys? Do anything you like to the girls, we can blame them for your bad behaviour afterwards.

Ace post.
I agree with every word and although I haven't stopped watching,I am really appalled at the truly biased and unjust treatment towards Hazel too.

Carole was a hopeless housemate and she is even worse as a panellist.

[Northern Monkey]

Yeah Gina defo stirred it all up but i think they want her in the final.Hazel was bad too,I think the producers would rather see Hazel go than Gina.

[Seanbon]

I firmly believe that the continued biased editing of BB,and the character assassination of Hazel on BBBOTS,is because Hazel would be of no use to BB if she won!! She probably would never have won,but they're making darned sure she doesn't.
Hazel already has a career,and her going on BB was in order to try and break into the UK market,which,despite the controversy,I think she will succeed in doing. She's a strong willed,savvy business woman,who will need no guidance from BB,and more importantly will not be easily manipulated by BB!?!
BB will get 6 months out of Gina,maybe a year out of Dexter,and then they will be forgotten,bar the odd "guest" appearance on BBBOTS!!!

[Spoon]

BOTS is always biased.

[Tozzie]

Of course she has a right to be angry but there is a right and wrong way to go about things. She went head on at Charlie, she was awful with her and did it in front of the whole house. Thats out of order. I do not 'hate' Hazel Livia, I don't like her though, in my mind she has a horrible personality, you like her, I don't.

[SurfersCreed]

It was 100% GINA who stirred things up against Charlie.
She was also the only HM to show a vicious GLEE at Charlie's distress.
Gina is a NASTY peice of work.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by SurfersCreed

It was 100% GINA who stirred things up against Charlie.
She was also the only HM to show a vicious GLEE at Charlie's distress.
Gina is a NASTY peice of work.

I like Gina but she was the one in the main loading the guns against Charlie after what her boyfriend said.

Hazel had a lot to say and did so, Hazel got a bolt from the blue as to Charlies awful friend nominating her and why she did so was right to get at Charlie in my view.