[Lex]

Originally Posted by smudgie

No Lex..we need Matt Johnson for the job

You blaggard!

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Everyone's Vanessa Feltz #1 fan now then I guess

I know,she was slated on here for her comments the other night.Really unbelievable.

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Everyone's Vanessa Feltz #1 fan now then I guess

I've always liked Vanessa, very much looking forward to her Strictly stint.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Everyone's Vanessa Feltz #1 fan now then I guess

No doubt. I actually thought Sam was brilliant - I was watching with the family and some friends and we all burst out laughing at him putting the big V in her place and the young ones all went 'yessssssssssssss, go Sam!

[jet]

I thought Gina was awful. So snooty and she just copied Sam (and Nikki G AGAIN) with the 'who is she'?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Everyone's Vanessa Feltz #1 fan now then I guess

Of course they are Jordan,wasn't long ago that she was a fat ******,lol and what exactly did SHE do that was so exciting on BB,oh yes went ga ga with a piece of chalk.just watch if Natalie Cassidy praises Dexter and disses Sam she'll be the forums sweetheart,

[reece(:]

who the **** is sche though, just a useless nobodyy

[alex_front2]

I lovr how apparently gina was ruder than sam, you can't make this shizz up.

[Spoon]

"I've done tasks" is a hilarious argument for why they should win the game and the cash. Here, I thought the tasks were required to live in the house and get fed.

Oh, he did also say he tells jokes, apparently not understanding what a strong argument that is against him.

[Johnnyuk123]

Originally Posted by Spoon

"I've done tasks" is a hilarious argument for why they should win the game and the cash. Here, I thought the tasks were required to live in the house and get fed.

Oh, he did also say he tells jokes, apparently not understanding what a strong argument that is against him.

Don't forget he has learnt how to make an omelette.

[Twildoo]

Come on...I think VF was out of order...Sam hs done nothing wrong, and has done nothing to her, so for VF to go on National Television and embarrass the poor boy was way out of line, that like saying to her......so Vanessa, I can see your on a diet Bang out of order.

[mr rochester]

Sam looked embarrassed by the question and tried to deflect it by calling Vanessa sweetheart and pet. Like her or not - it is still not very polite and some would say that it supports his unevolved attitude. (I'm a lad from the valleys and have a caveman attitude towards women).

Judy asked Gina a brilliant question which will make her uneasy for the rest of her stay. Gina did say she was a girls girl - and she HAS picked the girls off one by one. Gina made no firm response and for once she looked flummoxed. She too deflected the question and tried to bamboozle her way out of it by claiming not to know who the questioner was...She was not asked do you know who I am? she was asked a valid question and could not answer it. This could actually get Charlie more votes now because the public (who might not have spotted Gina has done this before Judy James pointed it out) may think Lets vote for Charlie to prove Gina could not get her out.

Both questions were difficult and somewhat derisory - however, the forum is full of comments about Sam sleeping and Gina ousting the girls.

The Twin-Tubs got off very lightly with an easy question from their friend Hazel - so it wasn't an even playing field. They should have all had thought provoking difficult questions or they should have all been given a pleasant question. So Sam should have been asked something kind by Callum and Gina should have been asked something kind by Dan.

There is strong evidence of bias (again) with the questions..

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by mr rochester

Sam looked embarrassed by the question and tried to deflect it by calling Vanessa sweetheart and pet. Like her or not - it is still not very polite and some would say that it supports his unevolved attitude. (I'm a lad from the valleys and have a caveman attitude towards women).

Judy asked Gina a brilliant question which will make her uneasy for the rest of her stay. Gina did say she was a girls girl - and she HAS picked the girls off one by one. Gina made no firm response and for once she looked flummoxed. She too deflected the question and tried to bamboozle her way out of it by claiming not to know who the questioner was...She was not asked do you know who I am? she was asked a valid question and could not answer it. This could actually get Charlie more votes now because the public (who might not have spotted Gina has done this before Judy James pointed it out) may think Lets vote for Charlie to prove Gina could not get her out.

Both questions were difficult and somewhat derisory - however, the forum is full of comments about Sam sleeping and Gina ousting the girls.

The Twin-Tubs got off very lightly with an easy question from their friend Hazel - so it wasn't an even playing field. They should have all had thought provoking difficult questions or they should have all been given a pleasant question. So Sam should have been asked something kind by Callum and Gina should have been asked something kind by Dan.

There is strong evidence of bias (again) with the questions..

Twins are getting such an easy ride, makes no sense to have Hazel in there.

[mr rochester]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Twins are getting such an easy ride, makes no sense to have Hazel in there.

Thats true...and if you couple that with Emma's assertion that the Twin-Tubs are TV gold - then we could easily accuse BB of bias couldn't we..?

Of course everyone will want Hazel to lay into Gina - however, I doubt she will since she will just want to talk to her Twin-Tubs and possibly Charlie...

Gina will stay quiet now after her confidence has been knocked by Judy James's question re; other women in the house...

[smeagol]

sam yet again proving what a complete nob he is. lad she said that , great question.
like i said the other day the guy is arrogant with zero respect for anybody

[Nellie]

I said this on another thread because I didn't see this one (sorry) calling an older woman 'pet' and 'sweetheart' - I was so disgusted that although I normally just read all the threads I had to register just to say how shocking this was to women my age - beyond belief.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Nellie

I said this on another thread because I didn't see this one (sorry) calling an older woman 'pet' and 'sweetheart' - I was so disgusted that although I normally just read all the threads I had to register just to say how shocking this was to women my age - beyond belief.

Maybe he has no idea how old she is though.

In any case, I am 21 and have no problem with much older females calling me pet, sweetheart,peach or any other terms.
I see no problem then, or why there should be any problems, doing so vice versa either.

[Nellie]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Maybe he has no idea how old she is though.

In any case, I am 21 and have no problem with much older females calling me pet, sweetheart,peach or any other terms.
I see no problem then, or why there should be any problems, doing so vice versa either.

Obviously you're entitled to take that view but even older women who would do as you suggest (and I agree there are some) would not appreciate being called the same by a young lad - and for that matter he shouldn't be calling any women he doesn't know intimately 'pet' or 'sweetheart' imo. But context is all - we already knew he was a sexist so I guess I just took it as even more proof. I just hope he wasn't relying on any older women to vote for him.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Nellie

Obviously you're entitled to take that view but even older women who would do as you suggest (and I agree there are some) would not appreciate being called the same by a young lad - and for that matter he shouldn't be calling any women he doesn't know intimately 'pet' or 'sweetheart' imo. But context is all - we already knew he was a sexist so I guess I just took it as even more proof. I just hope he wasn't relying on any older women to vote for him.

How then is not also sexist for Women to be like that towards men that they don't know.
If I took offence at the age of 21 and ven when I was much younger, at the older Women who have used such terms to me, I would likely be offended everytime I went to my local shop, store or even a lot of the time when I was at Uni too.

How can it be sexist for Sam to use the terms to a Woman he hasn't met but it not be the case if a Woman does so to a Man.
If you think they don't, I can tell you they do but I can't see a reason for any offence to be taken.

Were he calling her names or swearing at her, that would be a different issue altogether.

[billy123]

The point of the task was for them to be asked rude not very nice questions and see what they say.
It was pretty funny so theres no need for anybody to be getting all bent out of shape about it. Not everything has to be met with outrage thats just silly.
Chill out have a banana and enjoy the show not everything has to be a point scoring exercise.

[Withano]

When?

[Slevin]

i actually got a laugh at his response towards her before he answered. cant stand that woman. i only know who she is cause of BOTS and i only watch the exclusives or the eviction interviews anymore.

[CaudleHalbard]

When I was 21 nobody of any age dared to even try and patronise me! Middle aged women in shops often called me 'sir'.

A lot of it is to do with how you present yourself. Wearing a onesie will never help! Lol!

[Slevin]

i didnt realize Dex was wearing a onesie til the other day. i thought it was a hoody with gray sweats or something. i lmao not noticing that.

[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by Slevin

i didnt realize Dex was wearing a onesie til the other day. i thought it was a hoody with gray sweats or something. i lmao not noticing that.

bet you'll notice next time hehehe,