[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by don99

don't know what happened with my posts,only did one reply (perhaps a bit more is needed)

yeah, they do duplicate from time to time, don't worry

[don99]

thanks

[anne666]

Lauren nervous? now that is funny Nooooo she's being her latest self to the full !

[Fendertele]

Even if Lauren has a game plan, so what, she's been entertaining and has given us so many comedy gold moments.

[DanaC]

I don't see her as a fake woman. I see her as a woman who is fake. Just like her fakey fraudster family.

Nowt wrong with that. She's a contestant in CBB.

[don99]

i would hope that no hm or management company would have any input on what was shown but if bias is shown it can go against the hm(justified),when that happens it makes the production company look bad,if they put a bit more effort into trying to manipulate the hm's instead of the votes(public)the show would be a lot better.just to let people know i remember seeing the llittle so & so on wogan and have watched more bb than i should admit to and in my opinion if cbb was done better they would have more options on who to put in rater than desperation which it's becoming

[the_answers]

Fair enough !
Even if she's a good gameplayer I think she's overrated myself.

[sampvt]

I guess the main thing people are acting on is the fact that she is so different from the lauren we all now from BBBOTS last year when she was reporting on fashion and campaigning to get on CBB. She has used every trick in the book to be appealing and has managed to hoodwink the public into thinking she is the dizzy blond with problems and is misunderstood.

Now she has been uncovered, her supporters are up in arms and cant see how good a game plan she has. OK its a game but when you need to cheat the public to augment that game plan, it no longer becomes endearing, it crosses that line. If say for example gary Glitter was to go in there and play the good guy, should he win even though we know his back story, answer no........so then why is it that when Lauren does the same thing, we are all asked to forget who she really is. Sorry but I don't buy into that Bull dust. She and her scammer parents don't deserve my vote and wont be getting it either.

Once a scammer, always a scammer so if you want to ask us to accept Lauren for what she is in the house, same goes for Charlotte and she has been way more entertaining than dippy lauren.

[the_answers]

Originally Posted by sampvt

OK its a game but when you need to cheat the public to augment that game plan, it no longer becomes endearing, it crosses that line.

It's been the same for years.
You must have missed it.
Hardly suprising considering you supported Sam !

Originally Posted by sampvt

If say for example gary Glitter was to go in there and play the good guy, should he win even though we know his back story, answer no........

Disagree.

If you let outside prejudice enter the equation you might as well just decide who you like before they even step in there.

If what happens in there doesn't matter (and rapidly starting to think it doesn't !) then in terms of a finding a so called "worthy winner" there's no bloody point in watching it.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by the_answers

It's been the same for years.
You must have missed it.
Hardly suprising considering you supported Sam !


Disagree.

If you let outside prejudice enter the equation you might as well just decide who you like before they even step in there.

If what happens in there doesn't matter (and rapidly starting to think it doesn't !) then in terms of a finding a so called "worthy winner" there's no bloody point in watching it.

Yes I did support Sam and he won and your next argument sucks. Nobody said it mattered, all I was saying was that if the person inside the house isn't the same as the one in real life then the game plan can be scrutinised and as long as it is a fair and entertaining game plan, then so be it. However Lying and cheating isn't my cup of tea, sorry to see that you applaud it though. Each to their own.

One of the psychologists this week said that the kind of people that want mayhem and debauchery are those that sit alone with the laptop as their only friend and sadly I have a life so I don't subscribe to those thoughts. I tend to think \I represent a generation that abhors scammers but can laugh at stupidity as long as its not deliberately designed to illicit votes.

Lauren falling over and spilling tea isn't real, its put on. Sad you cant see that bit never mind, its all over tonight and the dancing starts.

[the_answers]

Originally Posted by sampvt

However Lying and cheating isn't my cup of tea,

Didn't Sam say he didn't want the money ?
Well done for supporting him (and Charlotte) anyway !
Each to their own.

Originally Posted by sampvt

I tend to think \I represent a generation that abhors scammers but can laugh at stupidity as long as its not deliberately designed to illicit votes.

I'm very grateful you don't speak for anyone on here except yourself !

Charlotte's antics aren't designed to illicit votes ?
Do me a favour...

What's a "fair and entertaining" game plan is a matter of opinion.
Some might argue, sitting in 1 big group and slagging off the others is hardly fair.

By nature game plans (where someone gains an advantage and others don't) aren't fair.
Whenever someone loses and someone gains some people will cry foul play.
A bit like Charlotte when she didn't get HER letter.

You talk about "mayhem and debauchery" yet you're voting for Charlotte.
I rest my case !

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by the_answers

Didn't Sam say he didn't want the money ?
Well done for supporting him (and Charlotte) anyway !
Each to their own.


I'm very grateful you don't speak for anyone on here except yourself !

Charlotte's antics aren't designed to illicit votes ?
Do me a favour...

What's a "fair and entertaining" game plan is a matter of opinion.
Some might argue, sitting in 1 big group and slagging off the others is hardly fair.

By nature game plans (where someone gains an advantage and others don't) aren't fair.
Whenever someone loses and someone gains some people will cry foul play.
A bit like Charlotte when she didn't get HER letter.

You talk about "mayhem and debauchery" yet you're voting for Charlotte.
I rest my case !

I wish you would rest your case, you talk ****e and make no sense. You cant even take the time to read a post properly. Did you watch tonight when lauren made the worst dive in history. That's what she is all about, total scammer and she needs no sympathy from anyone. She is trying everything to win but its way too late. BTW I backed Charlotte to win for financial purposes, I like ABZ the most so once again, try reading a post before you puke over people.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by cfromhx02

She wasn't happy at being awarded as the biggest game player on celebrity BB.It looks like many haven't believed that she is a real woman or that she is nice.

She has been genuinely nervous early on I think as she knows some people will never accept her as a woman and therefore won't understand why she was nervous

and won't accept that she is nice and think she was faking that too probably because many see her as fake as a woman and therefore fake about everything else.

I believe she is nice and believe she was genuinely nervous & has gained in confidence because of Courtney and many in the public who have voted to save her.

It's like she says, she is who she is as I always thought and all her reactions have been genuine

and not a game

She has not got a single nerve in her body,shes an obnoxious,attention seeking con artist ,just like her Mother and arsonist Father

[don99]

i don't think you can compare lauren to sam bb and cbb should be completely different especially in how you play the hm's

[the_answers]

No I didn't see it.
Even if she did, you see it as scamming, I see it as gameplaying.

If it was a good dive she deserves applause, if it was a poor one then she doesn't.
That's how I see it.

You seem to have a problem with her background but I couldn't give a toss.
It's not real life in there, it's a game.

Nothing wrong with wanting to win it.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by the_answers

No I didn't see it.
Even if she did, you see it as scamming, I see it as gameplaying.

If it was a good dive she deserves applause, if it was a poor one then she doesn't.
That's how I see it.

You seem to have a problem with her background but I couldn't give a toss.
It's not real life in there, it's a game.

Nothing wrong with wanting to win it.

This sums your whole ideal up. Let us all rest now and watch Charlotte take the prize and win me loads.

[the_answers]

If there's nothing they can ever do to change people's opinions because of their past then they're screwed before they even step inside the house.

You're dragging the outside world into it when they should judged solely on what they do in there.

Otherwise there's no point judging their actions in the house or debating the winner.

Sorry you can't speak for yourself and debate without getting personal but it's as simple as that.