[Robodog]

Yeah it's amazing how many people make their argument that 'Jim is prejudiced' by being more prejudiced about him than he has been in the entire 3 weeks!

It's like shouting 'I HATE PEOPLE SHOUTING!'

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Robodog

Yeah it's amazing how many people make their argument that 'Jim is prejudiced' by being more prejudiced about him than he has been in the entire 3 weeks!

It's like shouting 'I HATE PEOPLE SHOUTING!'

Sure is.

[delta]

The problem with Linda Nolan is she divided the house along the lines of sexism and feminism and Luisa and Sam F were sucked in, she needed a network of men haters around her to bolster her , almost obsessional, hatred of Jim.

It must have been very uncomfortable for Jim Davison being in the house and I am surprised he kept his cool. Notice now the instigator of all the hate has been removed how the house dynamics have changed? For Linda Nolan to use Luisa's mantra about the 46 minutes that we see and that she was never voted for by her fellow housemates all I can say about that, Jim or anyone else doesn't choose which minutes the viewers will see and just because someone doesn't get voted for by their fellow housemates doesn't mean to say that they are popular or well liked, a lot can slip under the radar. Jim and Liz were very easy targets, for what I consider to be a very weak, almost spineless, set of individuals.

In years gone past, numerous people have gone on to win big brother who have been voted for week after week. Life is a game and CBB & BB replicate it in minutiae, they are all playing the game of life with TV cameras on them and they will quite easy vote either for the softest target or the biggest threat. You can include Jim in both of those.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by delta

The problem with Linda Nolan is she divided the house along the lines of sexism and feminism and Luisa and Sam F were sucked in, she needed a network of men haters around her to bolster her , almost obsessional, hatred of Jim.

It must have been very uncomfortable for Jim Davison being in the house and I am surprised he kept his cool. Notice now the instigator of all the hate has been removed how the house dynamics have changed? For Linda Nolan to use Luisa's mantra about the 46 minutes that we see and that she was never voted for by her fellow housemates all I can say about that, Jim or anyone else doesn't choose which minutes the viewers will see and just because someone doesn't get voted for by their fellow housemates doesn't mean to say that they are popular or well liked, a lot can slip under the radar. Jim and Liz were very easy targets, for what I consider to be a very weak, almost spineless, set of individuals.

In years gone past, numerous people have gone on to win big brother who have been voted for week after week. Life is a game and CBB & BB replicate it in minutiae, they are all playing the game of life with TV cameras on them and they will quite easy vote either for the softest target or the biggest threat. You can include Jim in both of those.

Great post. Liz was nominated every time by the majority of her HMs why are they not lumping her in to the most hated HM category?

[Robodog]

Funny to compare last nights main show to last nights BOTP

The main show had Jim having insightful psychological conversations with the HMs and managed to compliment them and make them all smile (including Luisa)

The BOTP show had 2 professional 'psychologists' giving their insights about the HMs and only managed to insult them and (unlike Jim) made nobody smile. Far from it.

[delta]

Originally Posted by Robodog

Funny to compare last nights main show to mast nights BOTP

The main show had Jim having insightful psychological conversations with the HMs and managed to compliment them and make them all smile (including Luisa)

The BOTP show had 2 professional 'psychologists' giving their insights about the HMs and only managed to insult them and (unlike Jim) made nobody smile. Far from it.

He was really erudite, affable and funny in that clip and that's the Jim Davison we all know, yes he can be blue and near the nuckle at times ( he is old school) but he ain't a hater and has a real heart to him.

All I saw from Linda Nolan was HATRED.

[Blue Cadillac]

Originally Posted by delta

He was really erudite, affable and funny in that clip and that's the Jim Davison we all know, yes he can be blue and near the nuckle at times ( he is old school) but he ain't a hater and has a real heart to him.

All I saw from Linda Nolan was HATRED.

Spot on.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by delta

He was really erudite, affable and funny in that clip and that's the Jim Davison we all know, yes he can be blue and near the nuckle at times ( he is old school) but he ain't a hater and has a real heart to him.

All I saw from Linda Nolan was HATRED.

True. The house has been so so so much lighter since she left. Not just Jim but everyone. Look at Luisa !

Linda has given us some great BB rows in the house and made it a great series for that reason but i'm glad she's gone so we can now see them have a laugh together as one for their last few days.

The moody division in the house has gone. Perfect timing for the finale when you do actually want it to be a happy house.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Robodog

Funny to compare last nights main show to last nights BOTP

The main show had Jim having insightful psychological conversations with the HMs and managed to compliment them and make them all smile (including Luisa)

The BOTP show had 2 professional 'psychologists' giving their insights about the HMs and only managed to insult them and (unlike Jim) made nobody smile. Far from it.

'Jim had insightful psychological conversations'....But the actuyal psychologist was talking rubbish?
Heard it all now, I give up!

[Jordan.]

Why can no one have an opinion on Jim without getting labeled? The names thrown around on here are so childish.

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Why can no one have an opinion on Jim without getting labeled? The names thrown around on here are so childish.

Works both ways dear. Why can people who like Jim not have people questioning why we like him & call us names for liking him. Very childish

[MrWong]

For those rubbishing the opinion of Rachel Morris, what are your qualifications in that field?

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by MrWong

For those rubbishing the opinion of Rachel Morris, what are your qualifications in that field?

Are you suggesting only a qualified chef can tell when a meal is badly cooked?

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Same whining every series when something negative is said about the favourite on bots

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Why can no one have an opinion on Jim without getting labeled? The names thrown around on here are so childish.

You win the thread, time to close it now

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by Jack_

You win the thread, time to close it now

No one wins a thread.

Keep it open as long as people want to debate.

[rusticgal]

What made me laugh was that Luisa who has decided to bury the hatchet with Jim zsince Linda left (funny that...) sat at the table and told Jim she had never been talked to by a man like Jim had her....She thinks men should have more respect.... So it's ok for a woman to speak to a man the way she has to Jim...but he can't do the same to her because she is a woman.
Now that IS sexist... Luisa is very hypocritical.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

What made me laugh was that Luisa who has decided to bury the hatchet with Jim zsince Linda left (funny that...) sat at the table and told Jim she had never been talked to by a man like Jim had her....She thinks men should have more respect.... So it's ok for a woman to speak to a man the way she has to Jim...but he can't do the same to her because she is a woman.
Now that IS sexist... Luisa is very hypocritical.

I know,I laughed hard at that.She is a walking contradiction.She made herself look like a prize idiot when she said that.Silly girl,She's entertaining though,Just not very mature.

[Millicent]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

I know,I laughed hard at that.She is a walking contradiction.She made herself look like a prize idiot when she said that.Silly girl,She's entertaining though,Just not very mature.

One rule for Luisa and another for Jim

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Millicent

One rule for Luisa and another for Jim

I think Luisa is very entertaining, but a walking contradiction. Nice that her and Jim are finding some common ground.

[chuff me dizzy]

It was neither biased nor anti Jim it was FACTS,FACTS that been pointed out over and over on here for 3 weeks, he IS a liar, he IS a fake ,hes used Linda,Luisa to gain camera time ,and brownie points by turning himself into the poor victim,(just as he did when he beat his wife to a pulp)all proven by experts in the fields ,if they had said he was everything wonderful his fans would have jumped on it and claimed it as law, but because neither of the experts had a single good word to say about him they are wrong ? I dont think so

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

It was neither biased nor anti Jim it was FACTS,FACTS that been pointed out over and over on here for 3 weeks, he IS a liar, he IS a fake ,hes used Linda,Luisa to gain camera time ,and brownie points by turning himself into the poor victim,(just as he did when he beat his wife to a pulp)all proven by experts in the fields ,if they had said he was everything wonderful his fans would have jumped on it and claimed it as law, but because neither of the experts had a single good word to say about him they are wrong ? I dont think so

Totally agree chuff, well said

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

It was neither biased nor anti Jim it was FACTS,FACTS that been pointed out over and over on here for 3 weeks, he IS a liar, he IS a fake ,hes used Linda,Luisa to gain camera time ,and brownie points by turning himself into the poor victim,(just as he did when he beat his wife to a pulp)all proven by experts in the fields ,if they had said he was everything wonderful his fans would have jumped on it and claimed it as law, but because neither of the experts had a single good word to say about him they are wrong ? I dont think so

What 'facts'? How is he a 'liar'??

Linda is the liar, she told Lee her husband didn't steal any money, when the tealeaf was caught on camera!

And Jim didn't start on Linda, it was her who had a problem with HIM from day 1. She was the one who jumped on everything he said & turned everything into an argument (even him cooking her dinner!) So I don't see how you came to the conclusion that HE used Linda & Luisa to get airtime?? When Luisa was simply Linda's trained dog, who she used to bite on command!

And do you seriously think those psychologists can carry out an adequate prognosis on someone from watching a bit of them on TV?!? Even the most highly respected psychologists in the world would not be able to pin point someone's character without many sessions on a one to one level

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

It was neither biased nor anti Jim it was FACTS,FACTS that been pointed out over and over on here for 3 weeks, he IS a liar, he IS a fake ,hes used Linda,Luisa to gain camera time ,and brownie points by turning himself into the poor victim,(just as he did when he beat his wife to a pulp)all proven by experts in the fields ,if they had said he was everything wonderful his fans would have jumped on it and claimed it as law, but because neither of the experts had a single good word to say about him they are wrong ? I dont think so

So it's a 'FACT' that people with narrow eyes are all liars then? ?

Dosen't matter if they said that about Jim, Linda or anyone. It's not a FACT it's ridiculous. Especially coming from a psych 'expert'.

ps - using capitals just makes your argument look more desperate to be true - it doesn't make it actually more true

[Livia]

I find it hilarious when people assume what they're seeing in the house is feminism. I have never heard a feminist say "you shouldn't swear at a woman". It seems to me they're all feminists when it suits them, and use their sexuality liberally to get what they want the rest of the time.

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by Livia

I find it hilarious when people assume what they're seeing in the house is feminism. I have never heard a feminist say "you shouldn't swear at a woman". It seems to me they're all feminists when it suits them, and use their sexuality liberally to get what they want the rest of the time.

Indeed. And I was in shock last night when Luisa said to Jim that she has never been spoken to by a man like he has spoken to her & she expects a gentleman to behave like a gentleman, yet a lady can be vile, swear, be crude & an absolute slut bag like Luisa is. Complete double standards! That is NOT feminism!