[Kizzy]

Because of her impact in the house and her gameplay which has been very watchable, she was really let down by BB.

[kistar]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Because of her impact in the house and her gameplay which has been very watchable, she was really let down by BB.

Her impact on the house?

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by kistar

Her impact on the house?

Of course, the fact that so many people have an opinion of her speaks for itself.. Whilst the same can't be said for people like Kim.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jake.

the same can't be said for people like Kim.

The last two weeks has been the Steven and Kim show.

All she had to do was "open it" to get everyone talking.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

The last two weeks has been the Steven and Kim show.

All she had to do was "open it" to get everyone talking.

But she herself hasn't given any real interesting talking points. The showmance stuff is horrid and the majority of it has been about how 'controlling' Steven is. And 'open it', again, came from Steven.

[kistar]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Because of her impact in the house and her gameplay which has been very watchable, she was really let down by BB.

Yes because more airtime would have meant more money for her and Dexter ( he will no doubt be her manager) to make from her new soft porn career and that's so unfair of BB .

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kistar

Yes because more airtime would have meant more money for her and Dexter ( he will no doubt be her manager) to make from her new soft porn career and that's so unfair of BB .

Was my comment so good you quote me twice for a response?
Whatever her and whoever choose to do after BB it's not the issue, she had a gameplan and it was doing ok.. till all the unnecessary 'revelations'

[CaudleHalbard]

I found her rather unwatchable - constant moaning and bitching. Good riddance.

[kistar]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

I found her rather unwatchable - constant moaning and bitching. Good riddance.

Ditto

[Razor]

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard

I found her rather unwatchable - constant moaning and bitching. Good riddance.

^^^^ this

[Speedster]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

She lied to her closest people in the house. She tried to portray herself as an innocent person to boost sales of her webcam services where she creates a fantasy world for sleazy men to think they're corrupting a Good Catholic girl. She was an appalling creature and people actually want this charlatan back in the house?

You're exaggerating and you know it. I suggest you spend time away from the internet and BB.

[Jake.]

(and I personally couldn't give a **** what she shows on webcam, I don't look into/research the personal lives of housemates because I don't need to)

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Jake.

(and I personally couldn't give a **** what she shows on webcam, I don't look into/research the personal lives of housemates because I don't need to)

I don't care what she does either, but we are making judgements on these HMs. She has been exposed as a fraud.

It's like saying "I don't care if Nasty Nick as making it up that his wife died in a car crash. That's his business. He seems like a nice guy in the house"

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

I don't care what she does either, but we are making judgements on these HMs. She has been exposed as a fraud.

It's like saying "I don't care if Nasty Nick as making it up that his wife died in a car crash. That's his business. He seems like a nice guy in the house"

You clearly do, because that's what this thread seems to be based on. She shouldn't have been exposed in the first place, that's the point. And hardly, she hasn't lied about people dying, she just kept certain parts of her job to herself (which she should be entitled to do).

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by Jake.

You clearly do, because that's what this thread seems to be based on. She shouldn't have been exposed in the first place, that's the point.

Why shouldn't she?

And hardly, she hasn't lied about people dying, she just kept certain parts of her job to herself (which she should be entitled to do).

She didn't keep it to herself, she presented herself as something entirely opposite to the truth. As some sort of wholesome woman with high moral standards and attacked others for being slags. And she told blatant lies to the people she was supposed to be close to. What sort of person does this? And why are people defending her?

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

Why shouldn't she?

Because what she choses to reveal about herself is completely down to her.. They haven't exposed Helen for what she's done and they haven't exposed Steven's business as being worth a grand.. She was playing a game and should have been allowed to play it.. My God, we were promised 'ruthless' characters from the beginning.

[Tarryn]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

Why shouldn't she?




She didn't keep it to herself, she presented herself as something entirely opposite to the truth. As some sort of wholesome woman with high moral standards and attacked others for being slags. And she told blatant lies to the people she was supposed to be close to. What sort of person does this? And why are people defending her?

I'm not defending Danielle, I'm defending the principal.
You can't go after Danielle trying to expose every lie when Helen get's away with it as she is protected by law.
If that's the case they should never have let Helen on the show.
The show is about strangers placed together in house with no contact with the outside world. That's gone this series.

[mrflibble]

I don't like her and I thought she was a douche to her friends, but that doesn't mean that 1) she should've had outside information about her leaked into the house and 2) she should've been evicted instead of Kim. I don't want her back in the house though because I'm happy to see her gone, but she got a bad deal and it was unfair.

[Beastie]

Don't think she was robbed. We got the best out of her I think and that's it.

[Northern Monkey]

She fooled the housemates NOT US,We all knew the truth.We should'nt be all bitter.Her eviction should not have taken place.Kim is gone anyway,Danielle should still be in there.

[Yaki da]

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

She fooled the housemates NOT US,We all knew the truth.We should'nt be all bitter.Her eviction should not have taken place.Kim is gone anyway,Danielle should still be in there.

She should have gone in the first week imo. I thought Tamara was a more honest and fun person.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Yaki da

She should have gone in the first week imo. I thought Tamara was a more honest and fun person.

I'll agree on the honest part.

[Jamesy]

I don't like Danielle although I do think her eviction was unfair. Fake or not, the whole week of tasks was pretty much a direct target towards her. Why not reveal Helen's prostitute past? Kim's boyfriend talking on BOTS? Steven being broke? Nope, lets just make sure it's all negative stuff about Danielle.

I'm not defending her as I'm not fussed on her at all. But given her suspicious eviction and the targeting this week it hardly appears as fair and shows producer manipulation.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Jamesy

I don't like Danielle although I do think her eviction was unfair. Fake or not, the whole week of tasks was pretty much a direct target towards her. Why not reveal Helen's prostitute past? Kim's boyfriend talking on BOTS? Steven being broke? Nope, lets just make sure it's all negative stuff about Danielle.

I'm not defending her as I'm not fussed on her at all. But given her suspicious eviction and the targeting this week it hardly appears as fair and shows producer manipulation.

But apparently none of that matters because Danielle lied about getting her tits out

[MarcusMel]

Danelle adopted a persona and took it into the BB house. She played that persona well.
Is BB a Gameshow? People keep saying it is. Therefore based on the gameshow theory Danelle played the BB game well. Annoyed and intregued the public at the same time.
Letting the outside info into the house is not normally part of the game. However that went out with crowd reaction. So a little more and a little more and next its complete interaction with public and answers mean prizes type thing.

Audence member 'Paul' is he now a celeb? All this really does is take our minds off every day life and all the real horrible stuff that real people/gangs etc do to one another.
T.V. gameshows -the hope and opiate to the public masses.

However the normal reaction to this is - BB forum -it has nothing to do with real life.

So the OP's origional objecting is in itself hypocritical. Life is being ingored by watching and absorbing BB is in a way living a false life. The main objection is the a BB HM was being false and got in to BB with a false act.

People very rarely actually think. Probably because they can't empty themselfves of old false beliefs and build up to see the world in new and interesting ways.

Ask any criminal any bully any saint "Are you a good person" the answer is always the same 'Yes". The capacity for self to recognise being in the wrong seems almost non-existant. The same seems true for behaviour, we see behaviour that is bad but do not recognise that we are behaving in the way we identify bad.

Now that is off my chest and going nowhere - time to enjoy the only thing I truly own - the present time of now!

Spelling apology - I am dyslexic and can't easily recongnise spelling mistakes or good english writing