[Jason.]

Originally Posted by TomC

I think Harry could have beaten Jack the week she was evicted, and Simon was up in a week with eight people, many of which were bores.



You're saying that you think Sam's eviction was ok just because you didn't like her? And you're saying that Nick, Danny and Cristian were good finalists?

Well given it's the only time the producers did something right in a mess of a series that is a BB16, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. But no at Nick, Danny, and Cristian being good finalists. They were awful and bland.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Jason.

Well given it's the only time the producers did something right in a mess of a series that is a BB16, then yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. But no at Nick, Danny, and Cristian being good finalists. They were awful and bland.

But it was so grossly unfair regardless of who you like, so I don't understand

[Jason.]

It was but #4in4out was even more unfair tbh.

[Jason.]

Plus Sam would've finished 6th place 6 days later, so she was no big loss really. Whereas Chloe went to win the series

[LukeB]

I don't know because both have their faults

[Dominic]

I mean the twist is unfair, but it saved Chloe from eviction and secured her winning over 5 trashy males so I'm glad

[Jason.]

I personally think Danielle being evicted without a public vote by two irrelevant housemates who'd only been in for 4 days a year earlier was more unfair than Sam's Cashbomb eviction thingymaflop

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jason.

Danielle being evicted

Good times.

[Dominic]

Justice for Virgin queen Dani </3

[joeysteele]

It's always vote to save for me.

[Visage]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

It's always vote to save for me.

Same for me.

I don't like the negative vibe VTE creates.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Jason.

I personally think Danielle being evicted without a public vote by two irrelevant housemates who'd only been in for 4 days a year earlier was more unfair than Sam's Cashbomb eviction thingymaflop

I think they were both as bad as each other - the principle is the same. Same with Marlon.

[reece(:]

Danielle's is the most unfair eviction of all time, especially considering two non entities culled her.

[Jason.]

Marlon would've been nominated and out that week had it been a normal eviction with a VTE public vote. Him pressing the button cost him I think. So again, the only difference his none public vote eviction made was him leaving 4 days earlier

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Jason.

Marlon would've been nominated and out that week had it been a normal eviction with a VTE public vote. Him pressing the button cost him I think. So again, the only difference his none public vote eviction made was him leaving 4 days earlier

This is all speculation though. I think no one should go without a public vote under any circumstances.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

They do all the time. This is why someone like Katie Hopkins can get so close to winning.

Katie Hopkins was well-liked, hence why she came so close to winning. That sounds fair enough to me.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by TomC

Katie Hopkins was well-liked, hence why she came so close to winning. That sounds fair enough to me.

Exactly, well liked, even though she was a despicable human being.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Exactly, well liked, even though she was a despicable human being.

But if enough people thought that they wouldn't have voted for her and she would have gone much sooner. The same principle in reverse applies to VTE except VTE boots out the interesting ones.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by TomC

But if enough people thought that they wouldn't have voted for her and she would have gone much sooner. The same principle in reverse applies to VTE except VTE boots out the interesting ones.

No because many people who agreed she was vile would have voted to save her for entertainment.

You're jumping to the conclusion that people vote based on who they "like" or "dislike" as people. It doesn't always work like that.

I hated Jade as a person in BB16 but she was a decent housemate for the TV she made.

[Samm]

VTS but both have negatives

[Jason.]

People won't vote for horrible people in a VTS

80% of people voted to save a man who threatened to shove an epilator up a woman's vagina, whilst also threatening to knock that same woman out over somebody who's only crime was just arguing with that same woman the week she was up.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

No because many people who agreed she was vile would have voted to save her for entertainment.

You're jumping to the conclusion that people vote based on who they "like" or "dislike" as people. It doesn't always work like that.

I hated Jade as a person in BB16 but she was a decent housemate for the TV she made.

So you voted for Jade? The thing is with VTS you have to do something positive to stay, whereas with VTE you don't have to do anything.

Originally Posted by Jason.

80% of people voted to save a man who threatened to shove an epilator up a woman's vagina, whilst also threatening to knock that same woman out over somebody who's only crime was just arguing with that same woman the week she was up.

I've not seen that series so I can't comment.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by TomC

So you voted for Jade?

No. I wouldn't waste a penny on this sh*te.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot

yeeeeah if you think Marc, Sam, and Simon were the crux of the entertainment in BB16 then that speaks for itself

What does it speak for? It's my personal taste.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by TomC

What does it speak for? It's my personal taste.

I mean, BB16 isn't even a year old and I barely remember anything Simon or Sam did or what their voices sound like, and if you were able to get through Days 18-53 of BB16 and still value whatever contributions Marc made, then I don't know what else to say because our personal values and viewing values are clearly so out of whack (which is fine, but why bother going on and on about him)