[Jack_]

Originally Posted by MB.

If there's any voting system that I'd say encourages hatred, it's the one that kept Perez Hilton and Katie Hopkins around for weeks on end

Only if you take the housemates too seriously

Encouraging people to hate on the housemates and vote them out (in the process ruining the show) sucks. It makes the whole atmosphere of the community nasty

[Babayaro.]

I'm glad it's VTE again, since the majority of this year's bunch are knobs who would coast in a VTS

[Lostie!]

Good stuff

[Jarvio]

Definitely the first out will be a woman yet again, 17 years in a row. I wish I could be proven wrong.

The only way to have a man out first is VTS. It's sad but true.

Chris Eubank and Goldie are the only EVER male first evictees by VTE. And there was only a small handful of HMs in their series anyway.

It's ****ing stupid tbh.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jarvio

Definitely the first out will be a woman yet again, 17 years in a row. I wish I could be proven wrong.

The only way to have a man out first is VTS. It's sad but true.

Chris Eubank and Goldie are the only EVER male first evictees by VTE. And there was only a small handful of HMs in their series anyway.

It's ****ing stupid tbh.

But there is no decent women in this years show who deserve voting to save IMO

[Black Dagger]

VTS has killed off my favourites in CBB the last few years. It only ever saved the Shannons for me. And my faves all did well bar Eileen in VTE last year, so you know I'm not nearly as against it as I was a few years ago.

[Jarvio]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

But there is no decent women in this years show who deserve voting to save IMO

That's your opinion based on like, 1 day

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Good stuff

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by MB.

If there's any voting system that I'd say encourages hatred, it's the one that kept Perez Hilton and Katie Hopkins around for weeks on end

You cannot encourage hatred in anyone either way the voting is ,no one could change my mind on who I like or dislike

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jarvio

That's your opinion based on like, 1 day

Yes ,thats why I put IMO on the end of my comment

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Good stuff

[caprimint]

Vote to evict never ends well, but the production staff never learn for some unknown reason.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Yeah, there's nothing fair about encouraging hatred

How Nice

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

You cannot encourage hatred in anyone either way the voting is ,no one could change my mind on who I like or dislike

...well, you can. Vote to evict encourages voters to think about which housemate they hate the most and want to see leave (which is counter productive in itself, yay let's ruin the show), while vote to save encourages voters to think about which housemate they like the most and want to stick around.

One is a negative voting system, the other is a positive one. Of course it encourages hatred.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Good stuff

[Pete.]

The voting system that got Harry Amelia to the end

[Jarvio]

Originally Posted by Jack_

...well, you can. Vote to evict encourages voters to think about which housemate they hate the most and want to see leave (which is counter productive in itself, yay let's ruin the show), while vote to save encourages voters to think about which housemate they like the most and want to stick around.

One is a negative voting system, the other is a positive one. Of course it encourages hatred.

However, VTS can be negative too if 2 people are up. Because people may save a HM they don't care about just to get rid of one they hate. Like Andrew Stone.

[reece(:]

Have both systems like BBAU did!

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Jarvio

However, VTS can be negative too if 2 people are up. Because people may save a HM they don't care about just to get rid of one they hate. Like Andrew Stone.

That's why it should be VTS anyway imo - when it's head to heads the VTE lovers still get their way, and when there's more than 2 up it makes it a bit more varied (e.g. BB13 is a perfect example of this - reverse VTE for the first few weeks, then the amazing ABCD eviction <3)

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by Hayden

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Jarvio

However, VTS can be negative too if 2 people are up. Because people may save a HM they don't care about just to get rid of one they hate. Like Andrew Stone.

Of course, and that's why I think it should be VTS with 4+ up to ensure you cull the dull.

But under VTE, the biggest character will always leave. And the more people that are up, the more that usually becomes a certainty

[Josy]

Best way.

[nonstop]

Great. I love this voting method, it's classic BB.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Of course, and that's why I think it should be VTS with 4+ up to ensure you cull the dull.

But under VTE, the biggest character will always leave. And the more people that are up, the more that usually becomes a certainty

I detest vote to evict anyway and I agree with all you have said on this thread.

[TomC]

Originally Posted by Jack_

To be expected, but they really are pathetic and never learn

My hatred for C5 grows stronger every day. Can they just go bankrupt plz

it's getting a bit much now